Hi DLCT Ranger,
and thanks for contributing to OSM.

One thing that is wrong with your edit is that you drew a road (driveway) on top of already existing road (residential road). If you want to modify part of a road, the correct way is to split the road at that position [ click on the node and press 'x']. Then you can modify the tags in the new made segment.

PS1: Are you sure that that stretch is private access? How would cars (e.g. delivery) get to the stretch of the road on the island that is not marked as private?

PS2: We don't put descriptions into Name e.g.(Private Driveway). Marking it as private is sufficient.

DarylHannah,
thanks for contributing. Few things that should be improved.

1) leisure=park is for regular parks not skateparks (sport=skateboard)

2) Any reason for deleting streets in Philippines? They show up on satellite imagery.

3) The buildings you draw are very coarse. You can trace them better from imagery (Esri clarity or Maxar). Minimally please use square function by pressing Q.

4) Driveways are not tagged as unclassified, but with highway=service + service=driveway

5) When editing, please keep edits in one changeset geographically close. Your boundingBox is large and shows up as edits also in areas where you didn't make any changes.

Hi,
for next time, could you please keep edits in one changeset geographically close and also include source of the information.

Hi Jwheels9876,
thanks for contributing to OSM. I just found that you (seems to intentionally) moved power lines away from their correct position that crosses golf course.
Please don't do edits that damage other data and whenever you have questions about how to edit or tag objects you can always reach out to osmus.slack.com

Hi PackmanCt,
thanks for contributing to OSM. I just noticed that you also moved Hale Junior High School to an area of highway intersection with no apparent buildings. Was this an error or is there a new development in the area?

node/359264018/

Hi Scotty,
Thanks for contributing to OSM. One thing that I need to correct you about is that the name=* tag is not used for storing descriptive information. All of what you already entered has to be moved to appropriate objects and tags.

Here is a quick info on what you are looking for:
leisure=golf_course
golf=hole

Hi estepme,
there are several issues with your edits:

1) All the building (and other features) outlines are inaccurate. If You switch satellite imagery to 'ESRI world imagery clarity', you will be able to draw more precise shapes. You can also use squaring function to make them all angles 90˚

2) You created additional points with names for each building. Information from the points should go directly on the area and points should be removed.

3) You are misusing `landuse=commercial' and 'leisure=park' for features that have their own set of tags e.g. leisure=pitch for sport.

4) You put `intermittent=yes` on Mount Tom Pond, which would indicate that it is seasonally dry. That seem very unlikely.

Hi,
Good work on adding all the buildings. But please don't delete existing driveways. Those are valid data.

Also what I noticed, when you are converting node into area feature, please transfer all the tags to the new object, not only the name.

thanks

Hi, did you want to do `man_made=bridge` instead of `building=yes`?

Hi Boda,
for this import we decided to keep the addresses as separate nodes.

Hi,
just a tip for those walls. You can map them as a simple way with combination tags barrier=wall + wall = dry_stone

wall=dry_stone

Hi,
just noticed that something happened with the Still River
way/43413174

and also this building
way/851268973

Hi Richū,
thanks for contributing. Just a few comments on what I saw in your edits.

although, was:* prefix is somewhat used. Current preference seems to be more specific set of prefixes e.g. disused:*
disused=*:
osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

If the bridge is gone then we usually delete the feature as rule is to map the existing objects. But you can map the supporting structures that are still there with bridge:support=*
bridge:support=*

waterway=* tag is more meant for ships navigation on water rather than airplanes. I would keep the aeroway=runway tag and add surface=water. or change it to something like aeroway=water_runway

Thank for clarification. If it is really blocked off, might be worth to add nodes on both ends with barrier=chain.

Hi,
from the imagery it looks like that the passage is wide enough for cars. Path/footway are reserved for ways that are too narrow for vehicles to pass, this looks like a highway=track.
If it is only about access rights then you can add motor_vehicle=no.

Hi, even though what you are doing is correct, the way how you are removing these tags causes loss of useful data.
The proper way would be to convert those trail colors into hiking route relations: osm.wiki/United_States/Long_distance_trails
If you don't plan on creating those relations, I would then ask you to leave the name tags intact and let other user do the conversion.
Thanks

Hi, even though what you are doing is correct, the way how you are removing these tags causes loss of useful data.
The proper way would be to convert those trail colors into hiking route relations: osm.wiki/United_States/Long_distance_trails
If you don't plan on creating those relations, I would then ask you to leave the name tags intact and let other user do the conversion.
Thanks

Hi, even though what you are doing is correct, the way how you are removing these tags causes loss of useful data.
The proper way would be to convert those trail colors into hiking route relations: osm.wiki/United_States/Long_distance_trails
If you don't plan on creating those relations, I would then ask you to leave the name tags intact and let other user do the conversion.
Thanks

Hi, even though what you are doing is correct, the way how you are removing these tags causes loss of useful data.
The proper way would be to convert those trail colors into hiking route relations: osm.wiki/United_States/Long_distance_trails
If you don't plan on creating those relations, I would then ask you to leave the name tags intact and let other user do the conversion.
Thanks

Hi, even though what you are doing is correct, the way how you are removing these tags causes loss of useful data.
The proper way would be to convert those trail colors into hiking route relations: osm.wiki/United_States/Long_distance_trails
If you don't plan on creating those relations, I would then ask you to leave the name tags intact and let other user do the conversion.
Thanks