Thanks.
I don't know how often Amazon updates their routing maps from OSM data, but they should get it sooner or later.

Thanks! I have adjusted the area name as it is clear that it belongs to Guilford Land Conservation Trust from operator field.

Oh boy, you're right!
Fixed that here: changeset/129277340

Though it seems that waterpark needs some love. Some of the slides are even tagged as water drains. I think more appropriate would be something like:
attraction=water_slide

Hi and thanks for contributing!

Just a few suggestions on this set of changes. When you add a building, you can press Q to make its angles 90˚ and they will look nicer.
And a second thing is that when you finish editing in one area (e.g. state/ country) you can upload your changes to OSM before moving to the next one. This way you help people to better see what you have contributed.

Cheers

Hi and tanks for improving OSM!
Just a question, were you trying to update the Laurel Park boundaries?
In that case you can do that by dragging corner points or by creating new points (you can double click anywhere on the line to create a new point that you can drag afterwards).

Because you created a new tree row which is mean more for trees that where planted in a row one next to another.
natural=tree_row

Cheers

Hi, the previous version of tags was correct. House number goes into `addr:housenumber` field and street names are not abbreviated to Rd, Ave, etc.

Hi and welcome to OSM.
In this case those tags were correct. We mark driveways wit combination of highway=service + service=driveway. service=driveway

Hi, thanks for working on roads improvements in CT, but I see a few problems here.
I don't think that a commercial map is authoritative how the roads should be named. And secondly, any maps even on internet are copyrighted and copying information from them (whether it is google maps or mailamap) into OSM is not OK.

You can use public domain sources from government like https://portal.ct.gov/DOT/PP_SysInfo/Functional-Classification-Maps or those provided in iD editor like Bing Streetside or Mapillary. You can find them in the side menu "Map data" or when you press U.

But important is what is on the ground through a survey. For example this Lockwood Road turns out to be Wayside Lane which is posted on the road sign: https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=41.281554%7E-73.415384&lvl=17.0&v=2&sV=1&style=x&dir=293.5&pi=-2

Since you are editing roads, few more things:
1) Please don't create descriptive names like "(PRIVATE)". Use "ownership=private" tag
2) Don't use abbreviated names like "Rd" or "Ave", but spell the full name.
3) Before changing road classification please consult osm.wiki/Connecticut/Highway_classification wiki page or user jnighan who spent quite some time on the current classification in CT.

Cheers

Thanks for contributing. Though house number indeed goes into `addr:housenumber` tag as it was before.

Then you can provide evidence of this new development.

Satellite imagery does not show any ponds nor parks. Those areas are normal residential areas with buildings.

Thanks for contributing, but driveways are a valid type of data that we normally keep in OSM.

Hi,
thanks for contributing, but even though the name contains word "park" it is a golf course and not a park.

Hi Frank,
thanks for contributing.
Yeah the building shape doesn't reflect the reality. But in iD editor you can switch background imagery (press B) to "MetroCOG othoimagery 2019" and draw it more precisely.
Cheers

Hi and thanks for contributing.

Things to improve for next submissions:
1) Parts of address go to different tag
addr:housenumber = street number
addr:street = full street name (no abbreviations like St, Ave,..)
addr:unit = Suite number (without word suite)

2) Telephone numbers have to have international predial +1-203-...

3) We don't use tag "Country". No need to add it.

4) Don't add "Category" tag. It's already described in office=newspaper

Thanks in advance

Was probably to improve the road shape accuracy
https://osmcha.org/changesets/125488424/

Hi,
you were told multiple times to not create overlaps between green and fairway polygons, and to stop avoiding using of multipolygons by drawing the shape around bunkers. Please comply with the community rules.

Hi and thanks for contributing to OSM.
However, I could notice that the buildings you drew are not very precise. Almost all of them dont follow the real shape of the building you can see from the imagery and many don't have their internal angles at 90˚.
Could you please go thought your buildings again and adjust the shape so it reflects the reality? To adjust the angles you can press "Q" and the edit will do it automatically.

Another thing is, could you explain why you changed this research institute to a restaurant? node/6276061706
thanks

Thanks it looks all good.
The only thing that's missing is connection between the "crossing" and "road" lines. At their intersection they should share a node, which should be tagged as 'highway=crossing'.
I added them for you. Just have a look.
Cheers

All looks good.
Great job!