Mashin's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 27990137 | about 4 years ago | Urcite nie su oficialne
|
| 112885398 | about 4 years ago | hi, thanks for the edits. I guess the only thing is that the actual names of the faculty got overwritten by a generic tag. Would you mind joining Discord (https://discord.gg/openstreetmap) or Slack (https://slack.openstreetmap.us/) to discuss tagging strategy or coordinate with our large scale edits? |
| 112716619 | about 4 years ago | If a driveway has no trespassing sign then an option is to just add access=private tag. Definitely don't remove existing roads. |
| 112675984 | about 4 years ago | Hi Irwin,
|
| 112287661 | about 4 years ago | That would be appropriate if the feature actually existed. Right now it's tagging a thin air. |
| 112287661 | about 4 years ago | Well the idea was not if a tag exists, but if the feature itself exits. In OSM we map only things that still exist osm.wiki/Good_practice#Map_what.27s_on_the_ground Regardless of the controversial nature of railway=razed, the newly drawn railway goes through interstate highway, parking lots and even right though an existing shopping mall. We can be 100% sure that the railway is not there. |
| 112349686 | about 4 years ago | Looks great! |
| 112287661 | about 4 years ago | The thing is that we don't map object that don't exist anymore. But it can still be added to https://openhistoricalmap.org/. |
| 112288789 | about 4 years ago | Hi and thanks for editing. The trail you edited though removed all remnants of the original railway. OSM keeps only features that still exist. See more on the railway=abandoned wiki page railway=abandoned |
| 112287661 | about 4 years ago | Hi,
|
| 112282867 | about 4 years ago | Very nice! I like how this is shaping up |
| 111833331 | about 4 years ago | Hi and thanks for your edits. Just a reminder that name tag is not for leaving descriptive notes, but for an actual name of the object.
|
| 111465690 | about 4 years ago | Hi,
Driveways are more those short stretches, which lead from this road to garages. |
| 111426714 | over 4 years ago | Thanks for link to the map.
There was a link to interesting ruling (http://www.allgov.com/news/top-stories/court-rules-that-your-driveway-is-not-private-propertyunless-youre-rich?news=841368)
|
| 111426714 | over 4 years ago | Hi,
|
| 111000963 | over 4 years ago | Hi Stefault,
This is normally used on relation to denote that it is a multipolygon. |
| 111340093 | over 4 years ago | Hi, thanks for contributing! All your edits look good.
|
| 111296778 | over 4 years ago | Very nice job! Thanks
|
| 111174115 | over 4 years ago | This one is hard without an actual survey. Trees along Guigalá are too thick to see how wide the river is. Since the nearby river Escarrea is wide enough to see that it is a wide river I would lean more towards classifying Guigalá as a stream, but that is hard with this type of imagery. |
| 110882468 | over 4 years ago | You are doing a great job! If you want to make your life easier try editing with JOSM. It is not as easy to learn as iD, but has tons of useful functions and plugins and is way faster. Particularly useful for landuse/landcover are:
|