OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
27990137 about 4 years ago

Urcite nie su oficialne
changeset/16135182

112885398 about 4 years ago

hi, thanks for the edits. I guess the only thing is that the actual names of the faculty got overwritten by a generic tag.

Would you mind joining Discord (https://discord.gg/openstreetmap) or Slack (https://slack.openstreetmap.us/) to discuss tagging strategy or coordinate with our large scale edits?

112716619 about 4 years ago

If a driveway has no trespassing sign then an option is to just add access=private tag. Definitely don't remove existing roads.

112675984 about 4 years ago

Hi Irwin,
we handle these cases by adding access=private or access=no to the trails. Just please don't delete paths that exist.

112287661 about 4 years ago

That would be appropriate if the feature actually existed. Right now it's tagging a thin air.

112287661 about 4 years ago

Well the idea was not if a tag exists, but if the feature itself exits. In OSM we map only things that still exist osm.wiki/Good_practice#Map_what.27s_on_the_ground

Regardless of the controversial nature of railway=razed, the newly drawn railway goes through interstate highway, parking lots and even right though an existing shopping mall. We can be 100% sure that the railway is not there.

112349686 about 4 years ago

Looks great!

112287661 about 4 years ago

The thing is that we don't map object that don't exist anymore. But it can still be added to https://openhistoricalmap.org/.

112288789 about 4 years ago

Hi and thanks for editing. The trail you edited though removed all remnants of the original railway. OSM keeps only features that still exist.

See more on the railway=abandoned wiki page railway=abandoned

112287661 about 4 years ago

Hi,
Thanks for your edits, but the railway in Waterbury is clearly not there when looking at the imagery.

112282867 about 4 years ago

Very nice! I like how this is shaping up

111833331 about 4 years ago

Hi and thanks for your edits. Just a reminder that name tag is not for leaving descriptive notes, but for an actual name of the object.
If you need help with which tags to use to describe certain properties feel free to ask or look at wiki.openstreetmap.org

111465690 about 4 years ago

Hi,
as a named road that leads to residential buildings, I'd say this falls right into definition of highway=residential.

Driveways are more those short stretches, which lead from this road to garages.

111426714 over 4 years ago

Thanks for link to the map.
There was a lengthy discussion about this topic on Slack a while ago that I just reviewed (https://osmus.slack.com/archives/C2VJAJCS0/p1615311712470100). It seems people mostly agreed that we put access=private when there is a gate or sign that says no trespassing.
There was suggestion that if there is no sign or gate we could place access=destination as alternative.

There was a link to interesting ruling (http://www.allgov.com/news/top-stories/court-rules-that-your-driveway-is-not-private-propertyunless-youre-rich?news=841368)
and in CT it should be fine to be there if you didn't know you shouldn't (https://www.cga.ct.gov/2002/rpt/2002-r-0365.htm)

111426714 over 4 years ago

Hi,
thanks for contributing. Just a question, do you have an evidence that those residential streets has private access? Residential streets are generally public and if there is no trespassing sign it is legal to enter such road.

111000963 over 4 years ago

Hi Stefault,
just out of curiosity, what is the purpose of adding type=multipolygon to water areas? e.g. way/974767195

This is normally used on relation to denote that it is a multipolygon.

111340093 over 4 years ago

Hi, thanks for contributing! All your edits look good.
The only issue that I see is that the name=* tag is reserved for an actual object name, so "Latimer Lane Elementary School" is good, but descriptions like "Walking path to Clover Lane" should not be used.

111296778 over 4 years ago

Very nice job! Thanks
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111296778

111174115 over 4 years ago

This one is hard without an actual survey. Trees along Guigalá are too thick to see how wide the river is.

Since the nearby river Escarrea is wide enough to see that it is a wide river I would lean more towards classifying Guigalá as a stream, but that is hard with this type of imagery.

110882468 over 4 years ago

You are doing a great job!

If you want to make your life easier try editing with JOSM. It is not as easy to learn as iD, but has tons of useful functions and plugins and is way faster.

Particularly useful for landuse/landcover are:
* Improve way accuracy (for improving existing shapes)
* fastDraw (for quick drawing of curved shapes)
* Merge Contour
* Balloon (Shrinkwrap) for fast fill of areas