Mashin's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 169825551 | 5 months ago | Hi and thanks for improving OSM! Businesses like this one have to be placed on a building they reside in. Right now it points to a random place next to a highway, which is not correct. Cheers |
| 168898298 | 5 months ago | Hi and welcome to OSM! Thanks for your edits, here I just noticed two small things. * for simple stairs we typically don't create building:part area, but rather draw a simple line tagged as highway=steps.
* Driveways are more suited for reads leading to a house/garage. For parking lots, we use service=parking_aisle Cheers |
| 168818536 | 5 months ago | Here again addr:full should be expanded to individual fields. Opening hours should be conflated. |
| 168817999 | 5 months ago | Hi,
Problem is also in opening hours:
Should be simplified to Mo-Fr 09:00-17:00; Sa 10:00-16:00 I would suggest to revert all import changestes, discuss and review your proposal with members of OSM first and then redo the import. |
| 168818593 | 5 months ago | Hi,
The problem I see here that addr:full is not good way how to add address to POI. Especially it should not replace good address data that was already parsed to addr:* subfields. |
| 113974011 | 5 months ago | I believe that if the multipolygon relation has only a single member (which is the outer way) then is should be deled and the tags moved to the closed way. |
| 113974011 | 6 months ago | Hi,
|
| 98474823 | 6 months ago | Diki za upozornenie ale to bol niekto iny. |
| 168291768 | 6 months ago | Hi and welcome to OSM! All looks good. Thanks for your edit. Cheers |
| 167757051 | 6 months ago | Hi,
driveway=residential is not documented. |
| 167654557 | 6 months ago | Hi and welcome to OSM!
Cheers |
| 166310928 | 7 months ago | Hi, no problem you're doing good.
Then remove the "Charter #150569" from the name. The actual names that you mentioned are good to stay in the "name" field, but I think the street names should just be removed since that is not their real name. |
| 166310928 | 7 months ago | Hi and thanks for contributing to OSM!
Cheers |
| 165917425 | 8 months ago | Unfortunately, the node is not added automatically. I believe the purpose is to interconnect the sidewalk and road networks in order to make them routable. If the sidewalk does not share a node with a road then routing software can't give you directions accurately. "Marked" mean that there are markings painted on the road, but there are no traffic signals. You can find more info on osm wiki: crossing=*
|
| 165955453 | 8 months ago | Thanks for catching that! |
| 165917425 | 8 months ago | Hi Casey,
1) When a sidewalk crosses a road (highway crossing) it needs to share a node with the road. We also typically tag it as highway=crossing.
2) The sidewalks you drew are not very accurate. When drawing, try closely following the aerial imagery and place the nodes along the sidewalk centerline. Try also including more nodes as well. Particularly in curves so the shape is more smooth instead of being jagged. Cheers |
| 165310263 | 8 months ago | Hi,
|
| 153692501 | 8 months ago | That's true, could also be permissive. |
| 165061904 | 8 months ago | Hey! You are doing a great job Zack! I really appreciate the patience you put into drawing these land covers. Just in this case I saw that the lakes were supposed to be part of the Wildlife area, but not a part of the forest. And the only way was to re-draw the wood polygon. Also at this point you are doing quite advanced stuff. Might we worth for you to look into using JOSM instead of iD. |
| 164963890 | 8 months ago | Hi and Welcome to OSM! If you enjoy adding new streams then I recommend switching background imagery to LiDAR terrain. There you will be able to see streams clearly even through a thick vegetation.
|