Hi PcMouse1,
my bad, I used this as a reference point and did not delete it after editing. If I see correctly it has already been removed, which is the correct thing to do. I apologize for the inconvenience! MarMar

Hi Ale Zena, I didn't want to hide it - I wanted to improve it. The area which you have restored is approx 200 km2 and clearly contains huge amounts of smaller elements: scrub, farmland, water etc. With this size, anybody who intends to provide more detail to landuse/landcover potentially will only increase the mess. Theoretically it can be done of course but real life tells us that people will either just pile up different landcovers on top of each other (which is against best practice) or try to integrate them in the existing multipolygon resulting in incomplete relations that in the end nobody is able nor willing to disentangle. Such big polygons only make sense if they really represent one big landcover, e.g. huge extensions of pure rainforest or sand deserts. In our case, classifying such extensions with one single tag that clearly contains hundreds if not thousand elements that can be differentiated seems as bad practice to me. My impression is that this obeys to the wish to see something painted with some"more or less" accurate tag so it doesn't look empty anymore. But this will only keep others away from making the map much better.

Hola kapazao,
por lo que veo en PNOA en esta zona hay arboles o al menos arbustos altos. Por lo tanto podría ser o wood/forest o scrub, siendo difícil saber dónde empieza una cosa o la otra. Por ello y por densidad de los arboles he decidido poner en estas partes "wood". Cietamente en estas situaciones es muy difuso y casi cualquier opción sería buena. Qué es lo que sugieres usar?

Hi Ionut, I was trying to align with more detail the surrounding landuses and as you might know, CORINE source data is not very precise and in this case it seemed very strange that this area was really orchard. For this reason I removed so somebody with local knowledge could add the correct tags. I see that now there is mainly meadow, which seems far better. Thanks for checking and good mapping!

Hola aTarom,
Cert, ho acabo de canviar. Gràcies per l'avís!
Salutacions

Understood, for the dambos I will use wetland and seasonal then. Regarding wood vs. scrub: I am aware it is a difficult distinction and I basically try to distinguish the darker, more dense areas from others, although I know it is very subjective. As you are local I will gladly apply you guidelines but it seems it is not easy for you either. So, please let me know if you prefer me to change any tag and I will make the corresponding correction.

Hi ftcat, very interesting and helpful details. Regarding those "dambos": I imagined they were some kind of wetland but was hesitant to tag them as such, this area seems to dry as to justify it. Can you confirm it makes sense to map them as wetland? Maybe as wet_meadow with seasonal=yes?

Hi ftcat,
I am impressed with reaction time as I have started editing this area just a few hours ago. You feedback is very valuable, so I will tag all of those similar artificial open areas as farmland, as you suggested. The TEMP REF is just a node I create for myself as reference which will be deleted later. Is it coincidence that you seem to know exactly this is a termite mound or do you interpret it by any hint on the imagery?
Keep up the work and thanks again! Mar Mar

Hi! I am sorry, this was a mistake when copy pasting data. Thanks for the heads up, I have corrected it immediately. Cheers

Hi crsCR, thanks for your feedback. Good to know there are mappers in the area. You are right, I did this based on satellite imagery so I will be more careful next time and I haven't retagged many things. To be honest, I don't remember which is the exact way I have retagged but being on site we better rely on your criteria! Keep mapping and I wish you a nice day! Marcos

Hi trial, thanks for the heads up. Actually I always create address/entrance nodes at the entry of the house whenever I know where it is. Although I usually don't map in France very much I am happy to learn how to create addresses correctly. I have used the BANO layer now and added the nodes of the first 6 numbers of the street , maybe you can check if this is ok as the BANO nodes are not very precise either. Once approved I'll correct the rest as well. Have a nice day and keep mapping!

Oi Tullio, neste momento não vejo nenhum quadrado, provavelmente porque você já o removeu. Às vezes, quando há uma grande extensão de floresta, mato, etc. eu gosto de indicar que há algo e espero animar outra pessoa para completá-lo - mas como não sou da área não ouso desenhar polígonos realmente grandes. Saúde e continue mapeando :)

Hi Mouath Ibrahim,
of course this area should widely be tagged as "sand", not just this square. To my knowledge the tag "desert" is considered controversial as is not synonymous to "sand". Sometimes I create these kind of squares to highlight that an area is lacking "natural=* " because I don't feel confident creating huge polygons and I am not familiar with the area on site either. You are of course welcome to enlarge this area or add more squares. Have a nice day and thanks for checking!