Kasutaja Mander kommentaarid
| Muudatuskogum | Millal | Kommentaar |
|---|---|---|
| 55761092 | rohkem kui 2 aasta eest | some photos of relation/2347837 are on https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-37.628130559916&lng=145.53460105&z=17&pKey=466024774694168 |
| 55761092 | rohkem kui 2 aasta eest | yes
the route is too long to fit in one relation; so it's split into 4 member relations - 2347837, 2347838, 2347839 and 3391145 |
| 55761092 | rohkem kui 2 aasta eest | mtb=yes removed on 31/7/2023 |
| 19643088 | rohkem kui 6 aasta eest | I agree |
| 19497499 | peaaegu 7 aasta eest | A golden rule of OSM mapping is "When in doubt, actual field survey is needed". So don't change anything just by imagery. Based on Bing, you think the cycleway near end of Whitefield Rd is actually the Whitefield Rd. From Google Earth, It seems to me the cycleway and Whtefield Rd are 2 separated tracks; and that it is a path rather than a cycleway. So I won't change it, unless I go there and check it, or a local resident can verify it. |
| 19497499 | peaaegu 7 aasta eest | I have not been to that cyleway nor Whitefield Road. I didn't add the cycleway and the Road. I'd ignore this warning as that road and cycleway is very close to each other at several other sections; for example, 160m east of the end of Whitefield Rd. |
| 64562306 | peaaegu 7 aasta eest | Mr armchair mapper, I insist my original cycleway is correct as I rode my bike on the cycleway from start to end on 16/11/2018 And I took photos as I rode. See www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-37.9422361111111&lng=145.5002277777778&z=17&pKey=lykQ41d4DeyOpcD4XmEetg |