Hello 5359!

Sorry for the late reply — life’s been keeping me busy.

Amazing work! How do you manage to find all the suspect data?

I've closed changeset [173149255](changeset/173149255) removing duplicate address nodes with *landuse* tags. Those tags will be reviewed and processed later to match OSM guidelines and proper key=value tagging.

Current focus: mapping Address info (mainly addr:street and addr:housenumber).

Most other fields (e.g. latitud, longitud, area libre, densidad_d, minimo_viv, niveles, superficie) should not be mapped and mean geographic coordinates, regulatory attributes, landuse restrictions.

liga_ciuda → *should not be mapped* – links to the open source landuse data. Should instead be referenced via source=* in the changeset comment.

uso_descri → landuse=* – the values need further processing into residential, commercial, retail, greenfield, religious, etc.)

Thank again for pointing that out!

Hello 5359!
Great catch! Those tags must have come over from QGIS when the public source data was split into smaller manageable chunks. The ID tag is simply a sequential number for each file/chunk, and the size tag indicates the number of elements (ways) contained.

I’ve now closed changeset changeset/173069695 to remove them, and I’ll be extra careful going forward. Thanks again for pointing that out!