Hi, would just like to question if this tree truly has a proper name that makes it unique?

Hi Pitsche, thanks for the comment since I was keeping an eye on them. Considering they undid a whole business that is actually there and sent me no message, I'll contact the DWG.

Hi Adam,
Just want to make you aware that I will revert/edit the change to the path not being straight as the aerial imagery for this area is out of date and seems to have been used to trace it.

I also don't think the traffic island is that big but I am too lazy to check tbqh.

Hi Dan, I've noticed you've added disused to several names and it's not usual for names to include that in their name, even if they become disused.

May I suggest adding the "disused:yes" key instead in future (since that's still useful to know regardless).

Hello, thank you for your feedback.

Unfortunately I was doing this as remote mapping so am not able to survey on the ground and was doing this as part of maproutlette task.

Personally I don't believe we should leave incorrect data for data consumers to use as reminders but rather utilise `check_date` and notes to call for a survey.

I understand the reasoning and in future will take the advice on board to add a note or fixme for a survey.

Wondering if it's worth deleting "Way: Link Enterprise Bognor Regis Link Road (877577681)" since it's now been proposed for over five years and doesn't look like there's going to be any immediate construction?

The public GPS traces seem to be for the road only and not too great but the OSM UK cadastrals seemed quite off.

Ideally would like a second pair of eyes to check over since this kind of breaks the guidance to keep all buildings "misaligned" to be fixed later when compared to the north and south west a bit.