Yes - fixed

Noted

I thought I'd fixed this but apparently not. Checked and uploaded repairs - should be good now. Thanks.

Checked and fixed - thanks

Noted - thanks - will review and repair

Fixed - thanks

Noted - thanks

If you think the line tagging and details should return to "sidewalk" without common names affixed, I raise no objection and you're welcome to restore these attributes.

I started doing this with footpath updates based on precedents set in other areas (can't recall where). Made sense to me that where a footpath/footway aligns with a street or road it should have the same name attached and provides pedestrian access to properties on that street. For consistency and for Australian conditions, the correct reference is footpath. "Sidewalk" is a North American term not used in the Australian context and is not relevant in technical Australian infrastructure terminology.

Yes, ive been adding/updating signalised crossings. Not intended to break the cycleway/cycle route links. I will fix these wherever I've unintentionally broken them. Thanks.