OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
147557293 10 months ago

Hi rskedgell, On review from your feedback I realized that the dual carriageways should not have been extended and better understand the criteria for dual carrigways in OSM. So thank you for making the corrections.

162602608 11 months ago

Thank You for your suggestions. I reverted my changes.

162602608 11 months ago

Hi AntMadeira,

Thank you for reaching out to me. I have added the oneway tag to the entire stretch based on the TomTom GPS traces with a high density of traffic flow toward the west side. However, I dug a bit deeper and understood that the small stretch should remain two-way to access the destinations (Estaleiros da Camara). I misinterpreted this due to the very limited traffic flow in the east direction. I have made the corrections.

161640471 12 months ago

Hi Spaghetti Monster🍝, whilst making the edits I had some technical issues which prompted me to submit incorrect and incomplete edits which left issues on the map that you identified and commented on. I should have immediately gone back in and made the fixes but I neglected to do so. Now I have made the corrections to resolve the issues you reported and revise the road geometry to reflect the revised road layout.

161640471 12 months ago

Hi Spaghetti Monster, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you.

159655373 about 1 year ago

Hi @rskedgell,
Thank you for your valuable feedback. I completely agree with your input. I didn't delete the highway initially because @demisee might have created it for a specific purpose. Since the bus-related details are already correctly present in the route relation, I believe deleting it is the better option. I've made the fixes as per your suggestion. Thank you for guiding me again!

156553949 over 1 year ago

Hi MapGrid,

Thank you for the quick notice and happy mapping.

156553949 over 1 year ago

Hi MapGrid, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you.

155509198 over 1 year ago

Thank you, Happy Mapping!

155509198 over 1 year ago

Hi bxl-forever, Thank you for your feedback. I modified the geometry and added the barrier tags and I should have included this information in my changeset comment as per your comment.

Regarding the Jersey Barrier, I can see you are absolutely right, as per 2023 Mapillary when looking from a different angle Jersey barrier has moved away and bollards have been installed. I added the jersey barrier according to the 2022 mapillary available at this location as I did not see the alternative newer Mapillary. I have made the corrections.
2022 Mapillary Link: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.85227559997202&lng=4.4230053999999654&z=17&pKey=575946430918402&x=0.8962126640615664&y=0.6052549589602451&zoom=0

154960456 over 1 year ago

Hi KingKratos, I usually update the JOSM version when the new plugin libraries, or platforms that the application relies on are updated and compatible along with a few more bug fixes. In the previous version of JOSM, our technical team observed and suggested not to update the JOSM as it crashes abruptly while loading a few plugins. I am going to upgrade to the latest version once we have successfully tested and the crashing issues are resolved.

154960456 over 1 year ago

Hi KingKratos, Thank you for your feedback. I will look into it and will get back with my version.

153971392 over 1 year ago

Hi Dan_Fi, Thank you for sharing the detailed insight. This is one of the odd instances where my analysis went wrong due to conflict of sources. I will take this into consideration while mapping further. Apology for the inconvenience!

153971392 over 1 year ago

Hi Dan_Fi,

I placed the barrier according to the Wiki barrier=barrier_board. I can see this barrier in the photo from 2023 and as our latest GPS traces show no through traffic, so is supporting the imagery that there is blocked traffic, I concluded that this construction was not of short duration, was still ongoing, and so I applied the barrier. If the imagery was not supported by the GPS traces then I would not have applied the barrier. I would really appreciate it if you would share what you observed while you were there to help me further understand and improve my edits going forward for similar scenarios.

153971392 over 1 year ago

Hi Dan_Fi,
There is a construction barrier visible in Bing Imagery, also we can see the barrier in TomTom ground level image. The TomTom GPS data confirms there are no GPS tracks south-north through the affected way, hence I have added access=no tag. As this construction takes longer than few days I propose to put Barrier=barrier_board and access=no for the part of way heading north from the crossing. Please for review and feedback on my edits. Have a great day.

150536586 over 1 year ago

Thank you yasslay for correcting the data. I had accidentally added the highway tag and I'll be more careful while editing.

150536586 over 1 year ago

Hi yasslay, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you.

149308236 almost 2 years ago

Thank you Trail for the feedback, I'll be more cautious while there is an imagery offset.

141859880 over 2 years ago

Hi Rodrigo Rega,
Thank you for your feedback and reverting the data.

136820633 over 2 years ago

Thanks for the review and the tips & tricks, Frans!