Late reactie maar ik kwam toevallig langs way: 1174223606. Kan het zijn dat hier een highway key mist?
way/1174223606

Bij het doorsnuffelen van wijzigingensets die over "mijn" gebied vallen viel mijn oog op deze node: New Zealand Auckland (3797343152). De name is in 2023 gewijzigd vanaf Xenos. Wat denk je? incorrect?

with all but one POI being in Paris, is that one (node/534025632#map=19/52.376381/4.899830) maybe a mistake?

source=survey

Source also survey.

Additional information: This node/2743101314 is a node with the Amsterdam address , located in Amsterdam

Is rapids=tes in Passadumkeag River (1348558319) a typo?

way: 1374669938 heeft geen tags. Is dit een vergeten hulplijntje?

Hi again. It might be a good idea to go over this changeset. I picked out 2 changes. One because it rang a bell. I taught I came by the word in the wiki and one because of a weird, at least to me, name.

The first one is node/2168561999 With the name Cenotaph. If it is what the name says then it should probably be tagged " historic=memorial + memorial=cenotaph". See memorial=cenotaph

And the other one is osm.org/edit?node=6030845583 (name=The phone booth The Phone Booth". To me it looks to small to be a monument in the OSM meaning. it is on an islet next to a tree. And it also has the tag "tourism=artwork". It might still be some kind of memorial but I can not identify that with the information available.

P.S. The description of monument at the landmark key landmark=* is quite different from the one with the historic key :(

Are you sure about the historic=monument? monument is described as "A memorial object, which is especially large (one can go inside, walk on or through it) or very tall". And node/1840038725 definitely does not comply with that.

I believe historic=memorial is better suited for this one. With memorial described as "Small memorials, usually remembering special persons, people who lost their lives in the wars, past events or missing places"

See also historic=monument#Warnings

Hallo Peter. Ik was deze wijzigingen aan het bekijken, om er wat van op te steken en ik heb een vraagje. Bij crossing=informal (in ieder geval bij node/45045946) heb je highway=crossing toegevoegd. Als ik echter de wiki voor crossing=informal bekijk dan staat daar dat highway=crossing niet gebruikt zou moeten worden??

I did a quick search for landuse=water on overpass (https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1Zg4) and it came up with a total use of 3 world wide. That makes me think that landuse=water is definitely not the correct way of tagging :).

I had a look on de landuse wiki page (landuse=*) and there is no mention of landuse=water there. It has however landuse=basin. Which on its own page (landuse=basin) more or less says that that is a synonym for natural=water + water=basin.

Something wrong with the app version? The wiki article about OnWheels (osm.wiki/On_Wheels_app) mentions version 3.0.1

Shouldn't way/1348674229 be natural=water instead of landuse=water?

Most points are in a relatively "small area in the USA this one 12498551285 is the outlier.

Oops, also add heritage to building.

Looks like node/12450713898 creates the large changeset area. Possibly added by mistake? It has no tags and sits somewhere in the middle of a field in Germany.

At node/4590493913 you have removed the emergency=defibrillator tag. Was this really the intention?
This invalidates al other tags on this node which are defibrillator related.

Not much Władysław could do here to decrease the box size. It is caused by the relation.
That said, I am pretty new to this stuf, but is this a good use of a relation? It appears to be used here to "group" a number of POIs about Goethe.

Volgens hier https://www.breda.nl/herinrichting-vlaszak-groener-gastvrijer-en-verkeersveiliger permanent.