I-76's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 184114825 | For future reference, try to keep your changeset size to, say, one state maximum size. In this case if people are trying to search for a changeset in Des Moines, Iowa, for example, your changeset would show up. There's a section about this on the osm wiki:
|
|
| 181556530 | Thoughts on making way/1501221953 an informal path? While it might show on heat maps, there's no visual of it through the grassland I don't think. |
|
| 183837821 | Is the business office, per se, located here? Because if it's simply the private residence of the electrician it should not be mapped. |
|
| 183789374 | As far as I know, the "it" that exists here is a path (highway=footway or highway=path). Regardless of the ownership of the path - who owns the land, if there's signage, etc. - it can be mapped on OpenStreetMap. Normally if there is no signage signifying access on the path, access=yes is assumed, but ownership=private can be added. If there is access signage, that affects the availability of the path (and this applies to routers), the various uses of the tag access=* can be applied. Given your complaint, I think it remains reasonable to remap your path with the tag access=private . If it is mapped, even if undesirable to some (such as abandoned railways), it should remain mapped. Private features on private property should be equally subject to that. |
|
| 183313058 | Understood, thanks for clearing it up. |
|
| 183789374 | Regardless of whether public access is allowed, it should still be mapped. If it exists, it should be mapped. |
|
| 183313212 | Erm, this is Openstreetmap. Anyone can edit anything. Not sure what you're getting at. |
|
| 183313058 | Pretty extensive changeset for small survey details...did you combine changesets by chance? |
|
| 183313212 | Please read osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments Por favor lees osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
|
| 183313223 | Please read osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
|
| 183313304 | Please read osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
|
| 182554088 | You and void_aep I mean |
|
| 182554088 | You created a couple houses on top of each other! ( way/1512561098/history et al.) I've cleaned it up for you. |
|
| 182224051 | Hey there, welcome to OSM! A few notes about your edits here:
|
|
| 182075162 | Again Nearmap was NOT used |
|
| 182048791 | Did NOT use the Nearmap imagery for this changeset. I tested it as a custom background URL here so I could use it for a separate project. Would have been nice though... |
|
| 181915374 | Yep, reverted |
|
| 181717953 | Descriptive name and dupe building removed. Version and changeset should probably be redacted |
|
| 135753620 | Legendary Changeset #1 |
|
| 181723640 | 2000! |