OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
184114825

For future reference, try to keep your changeset size to, say, one state maximum size. In this case if people are trying to search for a changeset in Des Moines, Iowa, for example, your changeset would show up. There's a section about this on the osm wiki:
osm.wiki/Changeset

181556530

Thoughts on making way/1501221953 an informal path? While it might show on heat maps, there's no visual of it through the grassland I don't think.

183837821

Is the business office, per se, located here? Because if it's simply the private residence of the electrician it should not be mapped.

183789374

As far as I know, the "it" that exists here is a path (highway=footway or highway=path). Regardless of the ownership of the path - who owns the land, if there's signage, etc. - it can be mapped on OpenStreetMap. Normally if there is no signage signifying access on the path, access=yes is assumed, but ownership=private can be added. If there is access signage, that affects the availability of the path (and this applies to routers), the various uses of the tag access=* can be applied. Given your complaint, I think it remains reasonable to remap your path with the tag access=private . If it is mapped, even if undesirable to some (such as abandoned railways), it should remain mapped. Private features on private property should be equally subject to that.

183313058

Understood, thanks for clearing it up.

183789374

Regardless of whether public access is allowed, it should still be mapped. If it exists, it should be mapped.

183313212

Erm, this is Openstreetmap. Anyone can edit anything. Not sure what you're getting at.

183313058

Pretty extensive changeset for small survey details...did you combine changesets by chance?

183313212

Please read osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Por favor lees osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

183313223

Please read osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

183313304

Please read osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

182554088

You and void_aep I mean

182554088

You created a couple houses on top of each other! ( way/1512561098/history et al.) I've cleaned it up for you.

182224051

Hey there, welcome to OSM! A few notes about your edits here:
You added a name=* tag to a number of these objects that belonged only in the addr:housenumber=* slot. The name tag is different from the housenumber, I suggest you read the linked wiki pages for more info.
Another tip is the hotkey Q for squaring buildings. Most houses have square corners, so it's useful for mapping them in iD.
(I already removed the names and squared the buildings for you)
Happy mapping!

182075162

Again Nearmap was NOT used

182048791

Did NOT use the Nearmap imagery for this changeset. I tested it as a custom background URL here so I could use it for a separate project. Would have been nice though...

181915374

Yep, reverted

181717953

Descriptive name and dupe building removed. Version and changeset should probably be redacted

135753620

Legendary Changeset #1

181723640

2000!