I am looking at the relations listed in wambachers missing boundaries analysis: https://wambachers-osm.website/index.php/10-osm-reports/1119-countries-compare-2018-01-31

Current thread (german): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61207

I fear the names were copied from the 38north digital atlas (http://38northdigitalatlas.org/ - copyrighted) as claimed by one of the authors Curtis Melvin. (https://twitter.com/CurtisMelvin/status/952947641058516992)

See also history of: node/3723463569/history#map=13/41.0552/126.6610

Hello,
thanks for your contributions and welcome ot the OpenStreetMap project.

However there are two problems with this changeset.
First, you deleted several roads (including their history) and created new lines instead. Please do not do that, we won't be able to connect those new lines to the old history, rather move and edit the road if you change its path. Some other roads you didn't recreate (southern Strada Rulmentului), please keep in mind what you are trying to replace and finish that before uploading.

Second, when creating two ways that cross each other, please connect them at the point they are crossing (except for bridges and tunnels), routers are generally not able to change the road on crossing points if they are not connected.

Please apply those points in the future, if there are any questions do not hesitate to ask and happy mapping :).
- Helmchen42

Hello,
welcome and thanks for your contribution to the OpenStreetMap project.

Given the delicate nature of country borders. I'd like to ask you for your source of the "exact" location of the boundary line.

Also for your information, the changes broke the polygons of the boundary relations of Al Anbar and Najaf. I know that the iD editor only rarely indicates such errors, but please be aware of the possible mistakes especially when editing connecting nodes of multiple border segments.

Greetings, Helmchen

Hello,
your changeset introduced a large amount of leisure=playground north of Vladivostok. Those playgrounds seem to be duplicated with one of the duplicates slightly displaced to the northeast/southwest. A few of the playgrounds I've checked with bing imagery also seems to be plain wrong as they would be in the middle of the forest, in the middle of a field or occasionally intersecting allotments.

Can you explain some of those irregularities or did you maybe made a mistake somewhere?

Greetings, Helmchen

Wie Ich dazu komme: Eindeutigere Abgrenzung von örtlichen Bebauungen. Letztenendes würde ein landuse=residential hauptsächlich Gebiete ausfüllen die nicht landuse=farmland/meadow/forest natural=scrub/wood geschweigedenn landuse=industrial/commercial sind.

Als solches habe ich versucht von Wohnbebauung bedeckte Flächen anhand erkennbarer Grundstücksgrenzen (siehe die Ausbuchtungen in Eisfeld auf Höhe der Raststätte), zugegebenermaßen grob, zu erfassen. Als Quelle müssste ich entsprechend angeben: bing Luftbilder kombiniert mit einer hoffentlich nachvollziehbaren Abschätzung "ja das dürfte noch zum Wohngrundstück gehören.

This changeset was just a fix for broken boundaries listed in Wambacher's "International Boundaries" thread.

I have neither an opinion nor knowledge about the AL2 or Morocco in those disputed regions.