Yes, this is not highway=pedestrian` by itself, it's `highway=pedestrian`; `area=yes` (highway=pedestrian#Squares_and_plazas)

`area:highway`=* is the physical shape of a (single) way.

`highway=pedestrian`; `area=yes` is an area where pedestrians can freely move.

So, yes, this is a meeting point of multiple `area:highway=footway`, but this location is more specifically `highway=pedestrian`; `area=yes`.

On wiki, it's marked "?" for areas because whether it is accepted use depends on the value - for `pedestrian` it is a valid combination, but, for example, for `trunk` it would not be.

I agree it isn't great that it's routable (https://imgur.com/cn9lQii), but that's a software problem with routers and it's not even technically wrong - pedestrians can move anywhere within this area.

Anyway, I don't mind if you think this is wider highway way area and not a pedestrian area, but it should probably not be removed altogether.

Hello again,

As I mentioned before changeset/128474705, Bing is not aligned in Latvia. You are moving features to incorrect locations.

Hi!

What was wrong with way/984478396/history pedestrian area?

Hi!

Just wanted to let you know that Bing imagery is not aligned in Latvia. Please be careful aligning to it. I've fixed/realigned some of the buildings here.

Unfortunately, iD does not detect the local imagery layer near the edges of the country, which is normally listed as "Orthophoto (2016–2018), 1:5000, Latvia" in iD and is aligned correctly. If you move the view in iD inland, it should detect it, you can then switch to it, and then move back to this location with it enabled.

You have connected the grass area to road/paths again with way/1110378439 . As mentioned before (changeset/128455280), please avoid doing this.

Is there a new a bridge here?

Hi!

Please try not to connect areas to roads like way/1104667630 - the road line represents the middle of the road and but grass does not go the middle of the road.

You shouldn't add mud areas unless they are permanent (like a swamp). way/1110109943 does not seem like that. See
natural=mud

Also, you have not replied or fixed the issues with the former railway at changeset/127631652

These roads are probably not residential, but driveways.
service=driveway

Roads that only lead to one isolated dwelling or a farmyard are not part of the public road network and only access one property, so they are classified driveways. Residential roads usually have multiple residences/properties along them.

Hi!

Are you sure all of these buildings are houses? A "house" means a place where people live. building=house

For example, this way/1109970762/history is not likely to be a house because it's tiny and probably a shed. While this way/540701137/history is probably a barn or warehouse and probably not where people live.

Hi!

If roads like way/1109771761/history lead to isolated dwellings or farmyards, then they should most likely be tagged as driveways rather than tracks.

See highway=track example when a track is not the right classification: "A minor road providing primary access to one or several permanent residences (driveway)"

No worries!

For information, you cannot edit finished changesets themselves, but you can simply edit again. It will make a new changeset and that's perfectly fine.

Hi!

When this road goes through the building, is it a tunnel=building_passage ?

Since you are not replying but still actively editing, I have reverted this changeset.

Hi!

You set the building levels and roof levels to 0 in this edit. What kind of building is here? These values don't seem correct.

Hi, why did you delete way/177033064/history ?

You tagged more of these as buildings (changesets 128132917 and 128132992). Can you please clarify what you are trying to do? These are clearly not buildings.

Hi!

These structures do not look like buildings: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1166353293788990&focus=photo

What did you mean to fix with this edit?

`historic=memorial` is probably wrong and should be around the whole area. But these look like (retaining) walls.

Hello? Are you going to fix your edits?

Hi!

These look like roads leading to and within a private property, so they are likely driveways and almost certainly not unclassified roads.

I see someone already mentioned this before in your earlier changeset.

Can you please use the correct highway classification for these?

Hi!

Is this really a park way/1106749103 ? There's a fence drawn in the middle of it. And these way/1106749092 as well? These are tiny and look to be within private property.

For nodes like these node/10127430732 I think you meant to add `natural=tree`, not `wood` (which means a forest).