Jā, zīme ir tieši tur, kur joslas pāriet no 3 uz 2. Lai skaidrāk, iezīmēju kā node/12282338398. Bet tad drošvien redaktorā ir sajaukts posms, jo šis posms way/1327586787 ir uz rietumiem no zīmes.

Sveiki,

Šajā posmā way/1327586787 ātrums bija 50 garām stigas ceļam un 70 bija tikai no vietas, kur ir 2 joslas. Vismaz pavisam nesen (23. oktobris) pēc remonta tā bija. Gribēju precizēt, vai šī izmaiņa sanāca nekorekta vai arī tur kaut kas tikko vēlreiz mainījies?

Paldies

Hi!

A couple small notes I wanted to mention.

Trees like
way/1324986784 should be mapped as individual tree nodes (`natural=tree`) and not a forest area. Areas are generally only for locations with at least half a dozen trees where mapping individual trees would become unfeasible. Even areas like this way/1324986777 are usually not mapped as wooded and this is probably the smallest example that could be mapped as such.

You should also use `natural=wood` rather than `landuse=forest`, because "forest" in OSM sense means a managed forest - such as LVM forests that are cultivated and usually there are forestry works. Random trees in urban areas are almost all just wood areas in OSM sense. [1]

[1] osm.wiki/Forest#Approach_1 (typical for Latvia)

Thanks

Please do not split roads based on lanes. OSM generally only splits ways if there is a physical separation between ways (railing, guard rail, kerb, traffic island, etc) and not road paint. These here are turn lanes on the same road/way and not separate ways. These are mapped using turn lane tagging scheme.[1] I undid this edit. Note that you also did not update any of the existing tags like `turn:lanes` and `lanes`, so all the lane information became incorrect.

[1] turn=*#Indicated_turns_by_lane

Hi,

The addresses here are tagged on the buildings themselves, such as way/388743483, so there is no need to add extra points. These addresses are also automatically imported from the official register by a bot so these will get overwritten anyway.

You also added some incorrect values, like `addr:housename=(vispār arī tagad)` or repeated `old_addr:housename=Dakteri` as well as wrong `ref:LV:addr` numbers for several points such as node/12248362335/history. I think you were probably copy-pasting these nodes, so please be aware that they have a bunch of additional values.

Can you please clarify what (traffic) signage is here for the road such as way/805255581 that forbids foot movement? And why the bridge is not included?

@richlv: Tur vairs nav nosaukums.

Hmm. Yeah, I didn't touch any points that weren't at the exact same coordinates. I have no idea how ED even uploaded the same points but with different coordinates. Also, I didn't check the tags assuming both nodes to be the same since you said "reuploaded" and checking each would take forever. If my edit had errors, you should have just undone it.

I deleted surv. camera duplicates in this area in changeset/157847581, 41 in total.

Ar šo izmaiņu velotrase iezīmēta divreiz - way/1322921074 Arī zāle iezīmēta divreiz.

Pēc izdzēstā zāles gabala way/1317424529 palikuši pāri daudzi neizmantoti punkti, piemēram node/12193083775

Pieminēšu, kā ģeometrija šeit neatbilst ortofoto, ja vien šeit vēlreiz nav pārbūvēts pēc 8. cikla.

No kāda avota šāds nosaukums "JS Konteineris" way/1322921071 - kas tā ir par ēku?

Lūdzu izlabo kļūdas un rediģē uzmanīgāk.

Šeit ir izdzēsts servisa ceļš - way/937869949/history . Tagad vairs nav iebraukšanas ceļa teritorijā. Lūdzu izlabo.

Hello,

These are not building markers, these are address points. These do not imply that there are actual buildings. They are from official data, so they are "correct" even if the properties have not been properly updated in the official cadastral database.

You also removed nodes from buildings that still exist on the Northwestern side (unless all the private houses were also demolished? I don't believe so).

This data is also imported by an automated bot, so there's no point manually editing these points because they will get updated and overwritten anyway.

I undid your edit for now.

You haven't replied to my message, so I deleted the signals.

Jā, kā minēju, `https:=*//wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway`+`area=yes` ir "plaša vieta", bet tikai tas arī nozīmē, ka maršrutēšana visos virzienos. Bet šitas celiņš pievienojas vienā galā piebraucamajam ceļam un otrā galā celiņiem, bet pa vidu ir vienkārši plats. Faktiski jau kustība no viena gala uz otru un es kaut kā personīgi to nesaskatītu kā tādu laukumu. Un platumu jau atzīmē parasti ar `width`. Jo citādāk jau jebkurā platā vietā varētu likta `area=yes` kaut kādam `highway=trunk` utml. Šeit nav kaut kāda dīvaina forma ar daudziem savienojumiem, tāpēc es sliektos uz `area:highway`. Kamēr nav kaut kas līdzīgs [1], es tādus parasti saskatu kā "plats celiņš" nevis "plata vieta ar celiņu". Bet nu te tā atšķirība tik maza un tik līdzīga starp visiem 3 variantiem, ka noteikti nepareizi jau laikam nav neviens.

Un jā, iD ir ielikti preseti tikai `pedestrian` un `service` ar `area=yes`, jo tie ir pieprasītākie. Agrāk to `area:highway` vispār nebija un visi bija pieraduši likt `area=yes`. To, ka iD sūdzās, var droši ignorēt. Jo vairāk un precīzāk tego, jo vairāk sastopas lietas, ko iD (pagaidām) nesaprot.

[1] way/161282582

Hello,

Your edit makes it ambiguous which way the gate [1] is one. Can you please move it or adjust these connections so it's clear which way is being blocked. Is it the driveway? Last time I surveyed this a couple years ago, the path passed North of the gate like the connection was mapped before.

[1] node/10075131589

Please note that like I mentioned to you before, you absolutely cannot use Jāņa Sēta map for anything - it is a copyrighted map and we do not have permission to use it. Please undo any changes you have made based on it, because it makes OSM data in violation of copyright. You are also personally breaking the terms of service of JS. We can only use external data sources that have a compatible license or explicit permission for OSM.

Vienu un to pašu tie gluži neapzīmē. [1]

`https:=*//wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway`+`area=yes` ir plaša vieta, kur nevar noteikt celiņu "virzienu". Parasti ar to ir daudz savienojumi un faktiski pārvietošanās ir visos virzienos. Konkrēti `highway=pedestrian`+`area=yes` nāk klāt nozīme, ka tā vieta ir paredzēta cilvēkiem un parasti iekārtota ar infrastruktūru (soliņi utml.), piemēram [2]. Te var būt gan celiņi, gan veloceļi, gan pat ielas caur to. Celiņi tur var nebūt sazīmēti visos iespējamos variantos, tikai galvenie virzieni. Citiem vārdiem, tas norāda laukuma/teritorijas nozīmi (kas parasti sakrīt ar fizisko ceļa seguma izkārtojumu).

Bet `area:highway`=* norāda viena konkrēta ceļa fizisko laukumu. Celiņiem un ietvēm kā `area:highway=footway` tas ir no brauktuves/zāles/barjeras/sienas līdz otrai pusei. Šeit maršrutēšana ir tikai vienā virzienā, kas sakrīt ar pašu celiņu, kuru šis laukums apraksta. Piemēram, [3]

`highway=pedestrian`+`area=yes` ir bieži nepareizi lietots, jo iD tikai to ilgu laiku piedāvāja, bet `area:highway=footway` ilgi nebija preset'a. Un `https:=*//wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway`+`area=yes` vai `area:highway`=* vispār viegli sajaukt, jo tā jau tāda sīka specifika.

Šajā gadījumā, es to ilgi nedomājot pārliku (tikai kontūru neizlaboju), jo tur ir tas platais celiņš/savienojums no piebraucamā līdz ietvei, [4] bet personīgi es to nenosauktu par tādu gājēju pulcēšanās vietu, vienkārši plata vieta nosegta. Citādi tādi būtu visās malās un padomju māju pagalmos tādu ir ļoti daudz. Bet, ja tu teiktu, ka te tiešām būtu vērts to apzīmēt kā "gājēju vietu", drošvien jau var arī tā. Šitādās vietās tā atšķirība saplūst kopā.

[1] area:highway=*#Differentiation_area:highway_vs._area=yes_on_a_highway highway=pedestrian#Squares_and_plazas

[2] relation/13186729

[3] way/132004617

[4] https://imgur.com/yux55FX

I'm assuming this traffic signal crossing node was an accident? node/623609340

You haven't replied to my message, so I have reverted your change for now.

Hi!

Just a small note that roads like [1] are most likely not `gravel` surface, but `compacted`. Gravel means large rocks that are very uncomfortable if impossible to bike and walk on. These are actually very rare in Latvia and even public roads that were originally gravel quickly turn into compacted over a year or two due to traffic.

[1] way/1319984418