Hello,

Just wanted to check if I understand this correctly. What was your intention with this edit/correction?
I understand that name:etymology is for the word or term that the name is directly from, not for a lengthy description. I don't know if name:etymology:description is correct or used for that, but it's most likely not correct in the main name:etymology tag. name:etymology here would be "upe" (lv) / "river" (en).

Thanks

Hi!

Wanted to ask you about the access=permit here. On OSM "permit" means that anyone can normally gain a permit here, not just people who live (or work) here. Are these gates really permit-based and not just private for residents? Note that this is not the same as typical road signs "ar atļaujām", because those do not imply general public.

access=permit

Thanks

Yes, I think it's fair to delete the node.

I am however also interested in the other 2 hotel nodes added previously. One is on top of some rural residentials and one is in a multistorey building, but nothing in Mapillary or quick search suggests an obvious hotel. These could be Airbnb-style locations, but we don't really map those and the editor would have to confirm.

Hello,

Can you please clarify where exactly is this guest house is located? The node you placed is almost on top of an intersection in a park area. Is it in the building nearby? Does it have a name?

Thanks

Sveiki!

Paldies par šo punktu pievienošanu; vienmēr ir grūti apsekot punktus ēkās.

Gribēju pieminēt, ka nevajadzētu neko novietot vai pārvietot, pamatojoties uz to, kā tas parādās kartē. Ir daudz dažādu karšu, kuras izmanto OSM, un katrā no tām lietas var tikt zīmētas atšķirīgi. OSM ir pirmkārt datubāze, tāpēc visiem elementiem jābūt pareiziem - tostarp pēc iespējas pareizā vietā.
osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

Paldies

Hello,

I undid this edit, because you deleted the wrong element. You remove the "Valsts meža dienests" government office node. This office and this building are still here (as far as I know). The old building that was demolished and where a new one is now under construction is next to it.

Let me know if I misunderstood your intention.

Thanks

Sveiki!

Vai šie tiešām ir brasli node/11387611475 un node/11387611454? Ortofoto izskatās pēc tipiskām caurtekām grāvjiem.

Hi!

Just to let you know, I removed `landuse=military` from node/6278058121 . This location is not a military land use location.

Hi!

You shouldn't add bicycle=no to road segments where bicycle traffic is not forbidden with a sign or somehow else. Access tags are primarily for legal restrictions and bicycles are vehicles that follow traffic laws. As far as I know, it's perfectly legal for bikes to travel along A2 and through this intersection even if it's not safe or desired.

Sveiki!

Adrešu punktus kā node/9890030716 nevajadzētu dzēst. Tie ir importēti no Valsts zemes dienesta kadastra datu bāzes un gandrīz vienmēr atbilst patiesībai. Arī, ja tie ir meža vidū - šeit ir kaut kāda adresējama kadastrālā vienība. Tos regulāri atjauno automātisks process, tāpēc izmaiņas tik un tā vēlāk tiks atceltas.

Paldies

Fixed :)

Sveiki,

Kadastrā šis ceļa gabals joprojām ir "Stārķa ceļš" gar ēku. Vai Kuldīgas pašvaldību dokumentos ir citi dati par to?

Hi!

Thanks for your addition.

But the school has already been drawn here as an area: relation/14209436

A new point would duplicate the school element, so I have removed it for now and fixed the name. The existing area also had most of the information (except opening hours, which we usually don't include for schools because they vary a lot as you can see at https://www.ozolniekuvsk.lv/kontakti/ ).

Let me know if you have any questions.

Hi!

Wanted to ask you - is this cafe (pizza place?) inside the building? Is the Eldorado casino/gambling hall no longer in the building?

Thanks

Sveiki!

Paldies par izmaiņām.

Gribēju pieminēt, ka OSM lielākā daļa lauku vērtību ir iepriekš definētas, angļu valodā un lielākoties standartizētas pasaulē. Piemēram "u_veida" un "trijstūra_veida" vērtības datos nederēs, jo šīs nekas nemācēs apstrādāt. Šeit jāliek vērtība "stands", kas ir statīvi, kur pieslien riteni. Tā kā pasaulē ir simtiem variantu šiem, tad sīkāk šīs vērtības nedalās.

Par vērtībām var izlasīt šeit: bicycle_parking=*

Es pievienotos statīvus jau pārlaboju.

Paldies

Hi!

Thanks for the map correction.

I wanted to clarify whether this connection is completely impassable or if it's just not a road connection, but bike or people can still walk through on a dirt track or path? This connection is part of cadaster road line, so it's unlikely that it is blocked off completely.

Thanks

Kāds cits kartētājs norādījis, ka pārbrauktuve joprojām ir vaļā līdz mēneša beigām. changeset/144015095

Tā kā, ja tiešām ir izmantots Waze/Google nevis personīgi pārbaudīts (vai no piemēram ziņām) - tad to nevajadzēja vispār mainīt/dzēst pagaidām.

The bike route that you moved was only the name on the foot/cycleways "Centrs - Mežaparks". This isn't a route relation. The relations I'm talking about are:

E9 - City Centre - Vecāķi relation/10016280

Piejūras ceļš relation/11803322

Svētā Jēkaba ceļš relation/12304214

EuroVelo 13 relation/2769637#map=8/56.987/22.741&layers=N

I rerouted them over the bridge. This is more complicated to do, which is why I mentioned this for the future reference.

P. S. This is not part of the issue, but I also created and properly set up the Centrs - Mežaparks route/relation relation/16695367 . That's how local cycling routes are normally supposed to be done.

Hi,

When deleting ways, please make sure there are no routes/relations that get broken with this. Several bicycle routes and hiking routes were routed through the old crossing and sidewalk, so they all got broken.

I have fixed them and rerouted through the bridge.

It's also a good idea to leave ways that are clearly visible on the aerial as `was:highway=xxx`, so that someone else does not accidentally draw them again. I have added that for the old crossing - way/1223413784

Ir slēgta, bet runa par 9. autobusa turp-atpakaļ maršrutu/relācijām, kuras bija palikušas pa Gaujas ielu un ar pārrāvumu Brasas pārbrauktuvei. Tās vajadzēja pārlikt uz Brasas tiltu. Vai pagaidām vismaz nedzēst pārbrauktuvi (uzlikt access=no, piemēram), lai maršruts nesalūzt pilnībā.