Hi!

Did you mean to add `smoothness=impassable` to steps way/420369145 ? Have they been destroyed or something?

Sveiki!

Vietās, kur nav oficiālas pārejas pāri dzelzceļam un nav nekādas fiziskas atšķirības (piemēram node/10994367462 ), nevajadzētu
likt `railway=crossing`, jo šeit nav
pārejas maršrutēšanas nozīmē. Liekot pāreju rodas priekšstats, ka šeit ir apzīmēta vai izbūvēta pārejas vieta.

Hi!

Could you please clarify where this road goes in the forest? way/1192581883 Is there some new construction here or a new location? Road classification is based on its purpose, so I retagged into a `highway=track` for now, since it looks like a deadend forest road.

Thanks

Hi!

I changed some classification here. `highway=track` should only be used when it's just land access - forests, meadows, rarely-used sideroads, etc. Roads that lead to properties and residences should be driveways. Public roads should be service roads or unclassified. Roads leading to parking and tourism access are usually service roads.

Hi!

Please use the driveway preset `highway=service` + `service=driveway` when adding roads that go to individual properties, rather than `highway=unclassified`, which is a generic public road.

service=driveway

osm.wiki/Lv:Latvian_tagging_guidelines#Piebraukšanas_ceļi_lauku_sētām

Thanks

Sveiki!

Gribēju pieminēt, ka surface=gravel OSM nozīmē parasti ir "lielizmēra grunts akmeņi". Tādi Latvijā ir reti kur. Parasti bezseguma ceļi (tā saucamie "grunts" ceļi/"grantenes") gandrīz vienmēr ir surface=compacted - surface=compacted

Īsti gravel ceļi izskatās šādi: https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/hellphoto?pKey=795381835143910&focus=photo

https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/358602-general/topic/V22

Oh whoops, I literally saw the other changeset changeset/138800929 after this. I assume you double-checked them.

Hello!

Are you sure it shouldn't be `route=foot` and not `route=hiking`, at least for those routes that imply unencumbered walking?

route=foot

Thanks for clarifying! I re-updated the roads.

Hi!

Could you clarify the source for the node/10096988863 name? I can't find anything online.

Thanks

note/3302672

https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/358602-general/topic/Ciems.20ar.20.22.28ciems.29.22

I surveyed the location and the signs are still for a segregated cycleway, so I changed it back.

Hello again,

Unfortunately, you cannot use OpenStreetMap directly for personal notes or locations. The data from the map is visible to everyone and used by many maps and applications. For example, someone looking for a florist shop will find this location. So you should only add correctly specified/tagged objects. At this time, OSM does not tag flower patches and most historical features, so I cannot suggest any replacements. It's always possible to add new custom tags, but they wouldn't show up on the map anyway.

If you want to use OSM as a base map for personal notes, there are various websites and apps that can do similar functionality, for example https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/

Hello again,

Have the cycleway signs here changed? This used to be signposted as a segregated cycleway (even if it doesn't have any road surface segregation).

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=385929343752225&focus=photo

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=810117753438689&focus=photo

Hi!

Please be more careful when deleting existing ways. You left these ways unconnected to the cycleway: way/1126464298

There were also two cycle route relations that ran along these ways, so they didn't get rerouted. (The ones on way/1189004951 now.)

I also fixed some other minor issues.

Since you have just started editing, it's probably best to become more familiar before making major changes in dense areas, especially deleting ways. Let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks

Hi,

Can you please explain your last two edits and what exactly you meant to add.

How can there be a florist shop in the middle of forest?

And how is there a park area in a random forest location with an English name?

Thanks

I saw the long boardwalk and I assumed that was correct. The one NE is pretty long, so it seemed reasonable. I only saw it flooded/below water so I had no idea how far it goes.

Hi!

The direction on these signs was correct, as far as I can tell. I swapped them back again. I'm not sure if JOSM thinks they are wrong or what?