OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
174261116 29 days ago

You removed some valid oneway tags from ways here like way/846345814/history. Please be more careful.

175627166 29 days ago

Šajā izmaiņā ir veloceļš nomainīts uz ietvi, kas šeit, cik zinu, nav pareizi. Vai te kaut kas ir mainījies vai arī kas bija domāts ar šo izmaiņu?

175624848 29 days ago

Dalot un zīmējot šādus lielus ceļus atsevišķi ir jāņem vērā, ka šeit ir autobusu maršruti, pagriezienu ierobežojumi, esošas ceļu un pāreju vērtības un citas nianes. Lielu ceļu, kā šeit ir ļoti uzmanīgi jādala. Šādām izmaiņām vajadzēs iepazīties ar daudziem OSM sīkumiem.

Šeit diemžēl ļoti daudz problēmu un to labošana ir ļoti laikietilpīga, tāpēc šo izmaiņu pagaidām atcēlu.

175673157 29 days ago

Šajā izmaiņā gājēju pārejas nomainītas no luksofora pārejām uz tikai zebru, kas šajā vietā nav pareizi. Kas tieši šajā izmaiņā bija domāts?

175673940 29 days ago

Sveiki,

Ar footway=sidewalk apzīmē tikai celiņus, kas ir gar brauktuvi un CSN izpratnē ir ietves ar īpašiem nosacījumiem. Parastus celiņus kā piemēram way/1065908822 it īpaši ārpus ceļu infrastruktūras kā ietves noteikti neapzīmē.

175695526 29 days ago

Why did you delete the platforms and ways here? What has changed here? Where is the boarding for Jaunkalsnava now?

175697064 29 days ago

You have double-drawn some ways here like way/1457068390 and way/1457068392 .

You deleted a road instead of reusing or correcting it way/804415110 . After that, you left this road way/804415109 unconnected.

You drew multiple buildings twice on top of existing ones like way/1457068398 or way/1457068396 .

This way way/1457068375 didn't have any tags.

Many service roads were mistagged as drive-throughs, which definitely does not fit here.

Please be more careful mapping. JOSM was certainly showing you warnings about several of these issues, especially overlapping features. Please review your changes before uploading.

175697091 29 days ago

Why did you delete this road way/500076230 ? It is clearly visible on aerial. Has something changed here?

175290633 29 days ago

Please double-check this edit - this was previously (and is still partly) mapped with directional speed limits. As mentioned previously, please check maxspeed:type values. What has changed here recently?

175753044 29 days ago

Like the other changeset, what is your source for these speed limits? These are very specific values you added to what is non-public territory. So how did you acquire this data and where can it be verified?

175789057 29 days ago

Hello,

Can you please clarify where these speed limits are from? Is there a speed limit sign here or some other official restriction? Especially, where did you get the speed limit for a runway?

175786417 29 days ago

Also, please do not move aligned feature to old layout before the Braslas iela was rebuilt. You moved the sidewalk to it's old position overlapping the road.

175786417 about 1 month ago

Hello,

Could you please clarify what the way here is way/1457670995 ? You have deleted the building passage twice, but this way is drawn through a building. This is not really a valid layout.

Also, when drawing buildings, please use their foundations as the shape, not their roof - that is misaligned as aerial is at an angle for tall structures.

174478596 about 1 month ago

Skaidrs, pielaboju.

Tas ir planter box "puķpods".

Šim te pagriezienam arī except=bicycle jāliek, citādi velo arī aizliedz relation/19805014 .

Drausmīgs tiktoks...

174478596 about 1 month ago

Čau,

Tiešām barrier=bump_gate? Kas šeit īsti ir?

Es tā saprotu ka te no dienvidiem braucot labais pagrieziens tagad aizliegts. Tur ir uzlikts kaut kas?

170587388 about 1 month ago

Te maxspeed pielikās administratīvajai robežai way/74158162 :) Iesaku iD izslēgt robežu slāni, lai netraucē, jo tas tik un tā importēts un to gandrīz nekad nav jāaiztiek.

174791543 about 1 month ago

Čau, tev šeit vairāki `maxspeed:type=LV:rual` gadījās.

175005621 about 1 month ago

Sveiki,

Zīmējot elementus kā laukumus, lūdzu apvieno (redaktorā C) tos ar iepriekš iezīmētiem punktiem, ja tādi ir. Citādi datos ir nepareizi dubultēti elementi vienam objektam.

Šajā gadījumā zīmējot parkingu way/1452967154 , palika iepriekšējais node/11308614687 .

No citām vietām:

way/1444969871
way/1449372893
way/1445398225
way/1449475185
way/1453991791
u.c.

172334938 about 1 month ago

Čau,

Zīmējot elementus kā laukumus, lūdzu apvieno (redaktorā C) tos ar iepriekš iezīmētiem punktiem, ja tādi ir. Citādi datos ir nepareizi dubultēti elementi vienam objektam.

Šajā gadījumā zīmējot parkingu way/1432250288 , palika iepriekšējais node/11662459248 .

No citām vietām parkingi:

way/1424112624
way/1431575888
way/1429488909
way/1431575879
way/1431575863
u.c.

175432003 about 1 month ago

Sveiki,

Diemžēl izmaiņas atcēlu, jo tika (nejauši) salauzti citi robežu elementi, tai skaitā Sēlijas poligons vispār izdzēsts.