Sveiki!

Vai varētu precizēt, kāds tieši it darbnīcas nosaukums? Kas ar "/" simbolu domāts - alternatīvs nosaukums? Vai "Latgalītes" arī ir nosaukumā un vai tas ir tiešām ar pēdiņām? Un kas tieši bija domāts ar operator=Jančuks - vai tas ir uzņēmuma nosaukums?

Paldies

Hello,

As mentioned before in changeset/144715281, we'd like to know more about where exactly this guest house is located and some info about it as the node you created is in the middle of the street. I have removed the node for now pending clarification.

Thanks

Hi!

Just wanted to let you know that in Latvia there is general consensus to tag ways with blue cycleway traffic signs as cycleways, rather than footways. So these sidewalks should ideally be converted to `highway=cycleway` + `foot=designated` + (+ `bicycle=designated`) `segregated=no` (or the JOSM variant, although most stuff in Latvia uses iD variant). There are certain legal traffic law distinctions between sidewalks and shared cycleways, so it's best to be exact.

osm.wiki/Lv:Latvian_tagging_guidelines#Veloce%C4%BCi_un_veloinfrastrukt%C5%ABra

I can't say for other countries without looking into it, but on OSM in general European blue cycleway signs are tagged as cycle infrastructure.

Thanks

One of the other two was already deleted at changeset/141846834 . I deleted the other one.

Sorry, but I'm not going to waste my time on leaving yet another comment that won't be replied to.

Hi!

Thanks for your edits! I fixed a few issues and just letting you know about these.

Names should not be used as descriptions - either the feature needs a more specific tag or if it really needs an "explanation", then a `description` tag can be used. But the `name` should never be something like "bāzes stacija" or "pirts", because those are not the actual names of the features. Similarly, there are tags for things like `operator=LMT` or reference number, e.g. `ref=155` that data consumers can use. If the name of the area or point is something like "LMT bāzes stacija "Zaiceva"", then it would be just "Zaiceva" (and may be official_name for the long name assuming it's from an official source).

You also shouldn't create unspecified/unknown `site` relations for objects that are already within a common area, such as farmyard or industrial. Firstly, this is redundant to the area - everything is already in it. Secondly, data consumers don't really know or process these, because the actual type of the site or what should be included is not defined in OSM. It's better to just draw an area around if it's still not there. This also means other mappers have to maintain fewer features and there aren't data redundancies. And finally, one could make sites for pretty much anything they can think of (playgrounds, schools, supermarkets, etc.) - and while this is not forbidden, it also doesn't really improve the map unless there is a larger community support and standards for such sites. At the very least, if adding a lot of such features, then it should be discussed with at least the local community.

Let me know if you have any questions. I tried to summarize a lot of stuff in a very short message.

Thanks

Hello,

Please do not delete roads that exist in real life, regardless if the owner allows or doesn't allow to use them. For legal access of roads, there are `access` tags. So, for example, `access=private` for a road that is restricted by land owners. Here the road was previously tagged with `motor_vehicle=private`, which means vehicles cannot pass here, but for example pedestrians and bicycles can. Has this changed? Your comment only mentions "drive".

access=*

Thanks

Hello,

Just wanted to check if I understand this correctly. What was your intention with this edit/correction?
I understand that name:etymology is for the word or term that the name is directly from, not for a lengthy description. I don't know if name:etymology:description is correct or used for that, but it's most likely not correct in the main name:etymology tag. name:etymology here would be "upe" (lv) / "river" (en).

Thanks

Hi!

Wanted to ask you about the access=permit here. On OSM "permit" means that anyone can normally gain a permit here, not just people who live (or work) here. Are these gates really permit-based and not just private for residents? Note that this is not the same as typical road signs "ar atļaujām", because those do not imply general public.

access=permit

Thanks

Yes, I think it's fair to delete the node.

I am however also interested in the other 2 hotel nodes added previously. One is on top of some rural residentials and one is in a multistorey building, but nothing in Mapillary or quick search suggests an obvious hotel. These could be Airbnb-style locations, but we don't really map those and the editor would have to confirm.

Hello,

Can you please clarify where exactly is this guest house is located? The node you placed is almost on top of an intersection in a park area. Is it in the building nearby? Does it have a name?

Thanks

Sveiki!

Paldies par šo punktu pievienošanu; vienmēr ir grūti apsekot punktus ēkās.

Gribēju pieminēt, ka nevajadzētu neko novietot vai pārvietot, pamatojoties uz to, kā tas parādās kartē. Ir daudz dažādu karšu, kuras izmanto OSM, un katrā no tām lietas var tikt zīmētas atšķirīgi. OSM ir pirmkārt datubāze, tāpēc visiem elementiem jābūt pareiziem - tostarp pēc iespējas pareizā vietā.
osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

Paldies

Hello,

I undid this edit, because you deleted the wrong element. You remove the "Valsts meža dienests" government office node. This office and this building are still here (as far as I know). The old building that was demolished and where a new one is now under construction is next to it.

Let me know if I misunderstood your intention.

Thanks

Sveiki!

Vai šie tiešām ir brasli node/11387611475 un node/11387611454? Ortofoto izskatās pēc tipiskām caurtekām grāvjiem.

Hi!

Just to let you know, I removed `landuse=military` from node/6278058121 . This location is not a military land use location.

Hi!

You shouldn't add bicycle=no to road segments where bicycle traffic is not forbidden with a sign or somehow else. Access tags are primarily for legal restrictions and bicycles are vehicles that follow traffic laws. As far as I know, it's perfectly legal for bikes to travel along A2 and through this intersection even if it's not safe or desired.

Sveiki!

Adrešu punktus kā node/9890030716 nevajadzētu dzēst. Tie ir importēti no Valsts zemes dienesta kadastra datu bāzes un gandrīz vienmēr atbilst patiesībai. Arī, ja tie ir meža vidū - šeit ir kaut kāda adresējama kadastrālā vienība. Tos regulāri atjauno automātisks process, tāpēc izmaiņas tik un tā vēlāk tiks atceltas.

Paldies

Fixed :)

Sveiki,

Kadastrā šis ceļa gabals joprojām ir "Stārķa ceļš" gar ēku. Vai Kuldīgas pašvaldību dokumentos ir citi dati par to?

Hi!

Thanks for your addition.

But the school has already been drawn here as an area: relation/14209436

A new point would duplicate the school element, so I have removed it for now and fixed the name. The existing area also had most of the information (except opening hours, which we usually don't include for schools because they vary a lot as you can see at https://www.ozolniekuvsk.lv/kontakti/ ).

Let me know if you have any questions.

Hi!

Wanted to ask you - is this cafe (pizza place?) inside the building? Is the Eldorado casino/gambling hall no longer in the building?

Thanks