HellMap's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 138941921 | over 2 years ago | https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/358602-general/topic/V22 |
| 138800762 | over 2 years ago | Oh whoops, I literally saw the other changeset changeset/138800929 after this. I assume you double-checked them. |
| 138800762 | over 2 years ago | Hello! Are you sure it shouldn't be `route=foot` and not `route=hiking`, at least for those routes that imply unencumbered walking? |
| 119660943 | over 2 years ago | Thanks for clarifying! I re-updated the roads. |
| 127449750 | over 2 years ago | Hi! Could you clarify the source for the node/10096988863 name? I can't find anything online. Thanks |
| 138570549 | over 2 years ago | |
| 138501965 | over 2 years ago | https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/358602-general/topic/Ciems.20ar.20.22.28ciems.29.22 |
| 138397742 | over 2 years ago | I surveyed the location and the signs are still for a segregated cycleway, so I changed it back. |
| 138389346 | over 2 years ago | Hello again, Unfortunately, you cannot use OpenStreetMap directly for personal notes or locations. The data from the map is visible to everyone and used by many maps and applications. For example, someone looking for a florist shop will find this location. So you should only add correctly specified/tagged objects. At this time, OSM does not tag flower patches and most historical features, so I cannot suggest any replacements. It's always possible to add new custom tags, but they wouldn't show up on the map anyway. If you want to use OSM as a base map for personal notes, there are various websites and apps that can do similar functionality, for example https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/ |
| 138397742 | over 2 years ago | Hello again, Have the cycleway signs here changed? This used to be signposted as a segregated cycleway (even if it doesn't have any road surface segregation). https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=385929343752225&focus=photo https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=810117753438689&focus=photo |
| 138395100 | over 2 years ago | Hi! Please be more careful when deleting existing ways. You left these ways unconnected to the cycleway: way/1126464298 There were also two cycle route relations that ran along these ways, so they didn't get rerouted. (The ones on way/1189004951 now.) I also fixed some other minor issues. Since you have just started editing, it's probably best to become more familiar before making major changes in dense areas, especially deleting ways. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks |
| 138389346 | over 2 years ago | Hi, Can you please explain your last two edits and what exactly you meant to add. How can there be a florist shop in the middle of forest? And how is there a park area in a random forest location with an English name? Thanks |
| 138275330 | over 2 years ago | I saw the long boardwalk and I assumed that was correct. The one NE is pretty long, so it seemed reasonable. I only saw it flooded/below water so I had no idea how far it goes. |
| 126623477 | over 2 years ago | Hi! The direction on these signs was correct, as far as I can tell. I swapped them back again. I'm not sure if JOSM thinks they are wrong or what? |
| 138275330 | over 2 years ago | The boardwalk way still has smoothness=bad and surface=dirt left from before. These are probably not correct anymore. |
| 138155820 | over 2 years ago | Sveiki! Piebraucamos ceļus mājām vajadzētu atzīmēt kā highway=service + service=driveway. track var likt, ja ceļš tālāk dodas laukā vai mežā. osm.wiki/Lv:Latvian_tagging_guidelines#Piebraukšanas_ceļi_lauku_sētām |
| 138109410 | over 2 years ago | Atkārtoti jautāju par šo ceļa gabalu un lūdzu paskaidrot izmaiņu un kāpēc šis ceļš ir nodzēšams. Vai tas vairs neeksistē dabā? Vai tur ir barjeras vai šķēršļi? Vai ir citas ierobežojumu zīmes? Vai ēkas ir nojauktas/pamestas? Izmaiņu komentāri līdz šim "ceļš nav caurbraucams", "ceļš" un "nevar braukt!" ir viens otram pretrunā. Ja šeit ir ceļš, tad tas nav dzēšams, bet atzīmējams ar aktuāliem datiem un atbilstošu klasifikāciju un lietojamību. osm.wiki/Lv:Latvian_tagging_guidelines#Piebraukšanas_ceļi_lauku_sētām |
| 138066674 | over 2 years ago | Sveiki! Šeit node/11022785625/history noteikti nebūs fords https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=610751607498125&focus=photo |
| 137973199 | over 2 years ago | Pie reizes piebildīšu, ka surface=gravel Latvijā ir ļoti maz vietās. Faktiski, lielākā daļa ceļu ir surface=compacted. surface=compacted Īsti gravel ceļi ir nepārtraukts akmeņu slānis, kas izskatās šādi: https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/hellphoto?pKey=795381835143910&focus=photo |
| 137905272 | over 2 years ago | Sveiki! Vai varētu precizēt no kurienes (kāda vota) ceļam way/1000043790 is nosaukums "4x4"? |