Hello again,

Unfortunately, you cannot use OpenStreetMap directly for personal notes or locations. The data from the map is visible to everyone and used by many maps and applications. For example, someone looking for a florist shop will find this location. So you should only add correctly specified/tagged objects. At this time, OSM does not tag flower patches and most historical features, so I cannot suggest any replacements. It's always possible to add new custom tags, but they wouldn't show up on the map anyway.

If you want to use OSM as a base map for personal notes, there are various websites and apps that can do similar functionality, for example https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/

Hello again,

Have the cycleway signs here changed? This used to be signposted as a segregated cycleway (even if it doesn't have any road surface segregation).

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=385929343752225&focus=photo

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=810117753438689&focus=photo

Hi!

Please be more careful when deleting existing ways. You left these ways unconnected to the cycleway: way/1126464298

There were also two cycle route relations that ran along these ways, so they didn't get rerouted. (The ones on way/1189004951 now.)

I also fixed some other minor issues.

Since you have just started editing, it's probably best to become more familiar before making major changes in dense areas, especially deleting ways. Let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks

Hi,

Can you please explain your last two edits and what exactly you meant to add.

How can there be a florist shop in the middle of forest?

And how is there a park area in a random forest location with an English name?

Thanks

I saw the long boardwalk and I assumed that was correct. The one NE is pretty long, so it seemed reasonable. I only saw it flooded/below water so I had no idea how far it goes.

Hi!

The direction on these signs was correct, as far as I can tell. I swapped them back again. I'm not sure if JOSM thinks they are wrong or what?

The boardwalk way still has smoothness=bad and surface=dirt left from before. These are probably not correct anymore.

Sveiki!

Piebraucamos ceļus mājām vajadzētu atzīmēt kā highway=service + service=driveway. track var likt, ja ceļš tālāk dodas laukā vai mežā.

service=driveway

osm.wiki/Lv:Latvian_tagging_guidelines#Piebraukšanas_ceļi_lauku_sētām

Atkārtoti jautāju par šo ceļa gabalu un lūdzu paskaidrot izmaiņu un kāpēc šis ceļš ir nodzēšams. Vai tas vairs neeksistē dabā? Vai tur ir barjeras vai šķēršļi? Vai ir citas ierobežojumu zīmes? Vai ēkas ir nojauktas/pamestas?

Izmaiņu komentāri līdz šim "ceļš nav caurbraucams", "ceļš" un "nevar braukt!" ir viens otram pretrunā. Ja šeit ir ceļš, tad tas nav dzēšams, bet atzīmējams ar aktuāliem datiem un atbilstošu klasifikāciju un lietojamību.

osm.wiki/Lv:Latvian_tagging_guidelines#Piebraukšanas_ceļi_lauku_sētām

service=driveway

access=*

Sveiki!

Šeit node/11022785625/history noteikti nebūs fords https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=610751607498125&focus=photo

Pie reizes piebildīšu, ka surface=gravel Latvijā ir ļoti maz vietās. Faktiski, lielākā daļa ceļu ir surface=compacted. surface=compacted

Īsti gravel ceļi ir nepārtraukts akmeņu slānis, kas izskatās šādi: https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/hellphoto?pKey=795381835143910&focus=photo

Sveiki!

Vai varētu precizēt no kurienes (kāda vota) ceļam way/1000043790 is nosaukums "4x4"?

Kā iepriekš minēts, lūdzu bez paskaidrojuma nedzēst ceļus. OSM is kopienas projekts un neskaidras izmaiņas ir apspriežamas. Tā kā tu nesniedz paskaidrojumu izmaiņām un neatbildi uz komentāriem, tad šādas izmaiņas atliekt tikai atcelt. "ceļš" nav atbilstošs izmaiņu apraksts.

Sveiki!

Vai varētu precizēt, kāds tieši šeit ir izkārtojums servisa ceļiem - kas tie par tuneli un tiltu ap way/1125467902/history ? Pašlaik izskatās pēc ļoti dīvaina izkārtojuma.

Paldies.

Hi!

You set both a maxspeed=30 and highway=living_street on the road way/1051491220/history and nearby. Could you please clarify if this is indeed a living zone street and the maxspeed is wrong or if this is not a living street, so should be changed to residential?

Thanks

Sveiki!

Tu savā laikā pievienoji šai way/393458903/history un blakus ielai maxspeed=50 . Bet tā ir atzīmēta kā highway=living_street dzīvojamās zonas iela. Vai varētu precizēt vai šeit ir dzīvojamā zona un tādēļ nepareizs ātrums vai arī nepareiza ielas klasifikācija?

Paldies

Hi!

You set a maxspeed=50 on the road way/250947451/history , but you also tagged it as highway=living_street before. Could you clarify if this is indeed a living zone street and the maxspeed is wrong or if this is not a living street, so should be changed to residential?

Thanks

Hi!

Just wanted to let you know that a lot of these roads had been previously tagged with maxspeed, so those living streets are still with `maxpeed=50`.

It is also not `building:levels=2`, but `building:levels=1` + `roof:levels=1` according to Mapillary.

building:levels=*?uselang=en-GB

Hello!

If you remove sidewalks as separate ways, then you should add the removed values to the road ways - sidewalk=*. Otherwise, with this edit you removed sidewalk information completely.

Ideally, you should keep the separate sidewalks though, because it's impossible to map many important pedestrian and accessibility features otherwise - like kerbs or tactile paving.

Thanks.