good edit! how were you informed these needed the advisory attribute?

How is this a private road. There is constant public traffic on it. Maybe it is just privately owned by Providence?

I don't believe the tennis courts have been named but they are within the Taku Park. This is an example of where the de facto naming convention should be followed for edtiting osm. I may be wrong but I would assume someone would say "Let's go to Taku Park to play Tennis" instead of "Let's go to the Taku Lake Park Tennis Courts".

Hi, I've been reviewing your edits and I think they are very good. One issue with the changeset that I see though is listing the Campbell Creek Greenbelt as limited as the area only the creek between minnesota and dowling. It should extend further and be one object or a multipolygon. Would you consider this revisal?

good edit

has this been validated in person? It doesn't match the state GIS at https://www.arcgis.com/apps/dashboards/8afe8ee541394a7da408fdd7e946b4ab

The FNBP to Glenn Hwy route is something I hadn't fully considered. It really puts together alot of existing segments I'm familiar with. interesting!

great edits!

great set of edits.

Thanks for catching that. I added building=yes

I would like to revert the naming back to Alyeska Resort. The de facto naming locally is such and I view The Hotel Alyeska as a part of the total resort building and at a level of linguistic formality that is more marketing than what it referred to commonly for many years.

The fairweather should have four levels with the first floor being a garage/foyer.

building:levels=*

I might have a photo somewhere in my google photos but it isn't indexed in a way I can easily access it. Here is a googlephoto sphere link that shows the area has some intention to it but it isn't readable.

https://maps.app.goo.gl/Pu8sEuauo7wtxERn9

I am a local and I have walked by this area many times and can confirm that this is a de facto area used a dog memorial and it is labeled as such at the location.

there is a dog memorial here. why was this removed?

That sounds like a great solution! Thanks for following up.

Hello TIYA. I can tell you are acting in good faith in your edit in name placing but I am skeptical that the best course is to rename the lake.

The first reason is that if the lake is more of a unnamed tern then it should have no name instead of eagle lake as it was previously labeled.

The second reason is that if it is a colloquially known name that isn't named in another map, it would follow that it might be called Eagle Lake since it is the most headwater body of Eagle River. If you rename this lake as a new placemaking effort, which is not encouraged, it would follow that you might introduce confusion by naming it anything other than Eagle Lake. If there is another lake in the neighboring valley named Eagle Lake that is still there added even more confusion.

Third, while I honor your effort to restore the Dena'ina people there is an ironic toponymic colonialism in it as well... Mendenhall recorded natives calling this area Yunkla Creek in 1900 but this was it related to the settler's name for it as Eagle Creek/River. The recorded native name for this river is Nuk'elehitnu. If you were going to rename this lake, The above is referenced in Shem Pete's Alaska. I would recommend this name instead if renaming the lake was necessary.

nice details!

awesome edit set. thank you.

Amazing edits ottwiz!

Would you take a second look at this edit? I think the trail is closer to the road. Take a look at my trail recording I used to update it earlier this summer: @Hans%20Thompson/traces/11957596