Glassman's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 170743505 | 4 months ago | #TIP: We don't use descriptive names, just tag it properly has you have is sufficient.
|
| 170704922 | 4 months ago | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. It looks like you removed all but one polygon of a school bldg. And the one you added in the previous edit doesn't look right. Do ou have more information on the construction going on at the school?
|
| 170695759 | 4 months ago | There appears to be two bike ways for the Tommy Thompson Parkway. User MulhollandWildcatCWU added them. Only one exists. I'd recommend keeping the one with the relation and removing the other. Can you do that or do you need help?
|
| 170695345 | 4 months ago | ou tagged this as a bicycle road which should only happen if the road is signed. See bicycle_road=yes Also, the tag kerb extension ios typically a node where the curb extends out.
|
| 170685411 | 4 months ago | If the business occupies the entire building, then just add the business to the building outline, otherwise just add a node, but not both. Can you review this edit?
|
| 170686180 | 4 months ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. Please note that most alley's are not named. We only add a name if there is sign.
|
| 170685881 | 4 months ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 170647032 | 4 months ago | thanks for the update. |
| 170647032 | 4 months ago | Unless the road is marked as no trespassing, the access=private is not appropriate. A better tag would be ownership=private.
|
| 170646060 | 4 months ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 170641524 | 4 months ago | It appears you added a building within a building which another user fixed. In cases like this, just add a node for the teen life center.
|
| 170634649 | 4 months ago | typically the maxspeed is added to the road.
|
| 170596487 | 4 months ago | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. I have reverted this edit. None of the features look real.
|
| 170597877 | 4 months ago | Islands in the sea also need the tag natural-coastline. The outline needs to have the ocean on the right hand side. See place=island Coastlines in OSM are very different from just about everything else in OSM.
|
| 170503130 | 4 months ago | #TIP: we don't use descriptive names in OSM. Unless the camp is named "Camp Pitch near Trapper Creek Trail" can you remove the name?
|
| 170500319 | 4 months ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 170499810 | 4 months ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 170499546 | 4 months ago | Isn't the QFC accross 228th Ave SW? I've reverted this edit but can restore it if the QFC did moved.
|
| 170465349 | 4 months ago | Wow - a pole in the middle of the driveway. It doesn't sound useable anymore. Would you mind leaving a changeset comment on way/467479637 to explain to the mapper the issue with the driveway? |
| 170465349 | 4 months ago | Since the parking lot and service road still exist then they can be mapped in OSM. The service road was tagged as access=private, which seemed correct from what you describe. I see that someone else restored the service road. Once the parking lot is closed for rebuilding, then it would be appropriate to remove the service road. For example, I just removed a school building in Mount Vernon. When I drove by yesterday, it was being torn down. I see that you updated the fence, which is appropriate, and thanks for that. |