OpenStreetMap
Glassman's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 182360622 | #TIP: we often leave addresses since they can be reused.
|
|
| 182340341 | FYI If it helps, we have a lot more tags that can be added to help id a lot of information about the hydrant. See emergency=fire_hydrant
|
|
| 182320249 | #TIP: it is recommend to leave an address node when deleting a building. The address can be reused for future construction.
|
|
| 182317197 | I'm not sure, but it looks like you duplicated the existing cycleway. NE 40th Street is already tagged for bikes. Please review your edits to make sure you didn't duplicate existing tagged ways.
|
|
| 182316455 | I added a node for the used car dealership. according to Piece County GIS. The address is located at the north end of the area, not in the building with 7409 and 7413 addresses. also added website, but was unable to pull any schema.org data. |
|
| 182269534 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 182267551 | How does traffice get to 14151 4th Ave NE since you removed it's driveway? The county still shows the road as existing.
|
|
| 182266869 | #TIP: If the road continues to the house, it should be marked as highway=service + service=driveway and access=private since there is a gate.
|
|
| 182139266 | Why is this a city wall border? There also appears to be two city wall borders. See way/1507975676 and way/167531878
|
|
| 182096163 | From imagery, it appears that the service road continues so why did you remove it? In OSM, if the object can be ground truthed, it can be added. If something is blocking traffic from using it, the blocking object should be added to the way.
|
|
| 182082495 | These appear to be service roads according to county documents. I'll send you a more info on OSM in a message. Check out the wiki page for highway classification. Can you review this edit to make sure these are actually residential or service roads?
|
|
| 182083665 | To move the admin boundary, it will need to be unglued from the street. In the iD editor (browser) select the admin boundary the hit Shift D to unglue the two linestrings. Note this can be challenging. It's we we don't recommend joining two different features. Let me know if you need help.
|
|
| 182022045 | I find it hard to believe there is a shop in the middle of the forest with no roads around. I'm going to revert this edit. I'll send you more infomation on OSM in a message.
|
|
| 181968290 | #TIP: before using information from websites, make sure that the information isn't copyrighted. Since these are mountain peak names, I'd assume the information is public.
|
|
| 181955829 | I corrected a couple of problems. the driveway to 4744 still needs the tag highway=service. Also the gate is just a node on the driveway to tell routers that there is a gate in its path
|
|
| 181912073 | You may want to research the wiki for tagging dirt bikes (motorcycle) See access=*. Also be aware, many of the trails in the state do not allow motorized vehicles with some exceptions. You can also join our Slack, which I'll send you more info on, to ask the best way to tag for dirt bikes.
|
|
| 181901351 | I've update the streets back to residential and removed access=no. Let me know if you disagree.
|
|
| 181901309 | Same comments as on your first edit.
|
|
| 181901254 | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. Two problems, the first is access=no is not likely since this road services a number of residences. Second, living_streets are very rare in the US. You can tag the road as ownership=private. If there are posted no trespassing signs then add access=private.
|
|
| 181889498 | Looks good, not sure how the node got moved to the sidewalk so I moved in back inside of the bldg
|