I've gone through the cities of Norfolk, Portsmouth, Chesapeake, Suffolk, Virginia Beach, Hampton, Newport News to remove "city" from the addr:city field.

Having local knowledge of these areas, neither the city names, nor the postal addresses within them include the "City" moniker. The state's data likely includes city due to the "independent city" nature of incorporated cities in the state of virginia whereby they are conferred the same importance/classification as a county.

PS thanks for the cleanup of the building shapes leftover from the building imports in the area.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133425521

Just a small point: addresses in Portsmouth should be addr:city = Portsmouth, not "Portsmouth City" This can be seen on the new buildings added around way/1152579274
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133425521

I'm sorry, but this was never a building.

Its tags already include the was: and removed: lifecycle prefixes to denote it is no longer there.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132730944

Hello, I noticed your mapping around Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, I'm curious why you removed amenity: hospital and healthcare: hospital from the medical center?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133288060

Hi, I noticed your tagging around the Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, always good to have folks improving the map.

You mapped a road passing under an elevated walkway as layer=-1. Negative layer values are only appropriate for features below regular ground level.

a ground level road that crosses under a building part should be tagged either covered:yes or the building part should be tagged as level 1(or higher)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133287027

I am reverting this changeset, low quality data.

Taxiways that have "x" on aerial imagery and on FAA airport diagrams should not be marked as active taxiways.

This is but one of numerous data quality issues with this changeset and reason for revert.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120898643