Diacritic's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 120211590 | over 3 years ago | Hey, thanks for the heads up. Not sure what happened here with my edit - I think I must have cleared it while trying to remove some of the tangled ways. I've tried to realign it with what was my original intention, putting an only right turn on that off ramp edge. Happy to adjust again if that's not a winner either. |
| 120373827 | over 3 years ago | Hey Scott; I think you've made a slight misjudgment here. These slip lanes are certainly not motorways, and should probably be left as links until they join the motorway. Dian
|
| 120234311 | over 3 years ago | Hi Jw1t, Thanks for the edit! I've slightly adjusted what you've modified: I've changed highway=residential to highway=footway, as that would appear to be the best tagging. If you hvae any questions or would like to know more about editing, get in touch! Dian
|
| 119836393 | over 3 years ago | Hey Mitch. :) Just saw this edit and noticed it will cause issues for routing software. When drawing dual carriageway intersections, its best to draw the lanes as a "box" rather than crossing them as an "X". osm.wiki/Dual_carriageway#How_to_map
|
| 119600054 | over 3 years ago | Thanks for the pick up kimo. I've reverted my changes to 687895266. |
| 119409419 | over 3 years ago | Hi MapAnalyser, You seem to have ignored my comments on your previous chage. I explained details as to why I do not believe this tagging is correct. Further, you've change the name of Mercer Drive to include a descriptive "Offramp". Please explain to me why you are determined on these roads being "motorway links".
|
| 119144105 | over 3 years ago | Hello MapAnalyser, I have not received a response, but I was able to conduct a survey myself earlier. Terminal Drive and Mercer Drive have "END FREEWAY" signs almost as soon as you leave the Tulla. (I've added these as points). This implies that there is no access restrictions beyond that point, and indeed these roads have driveways and other access points which make them much more like "normal" roads than link roads. Similarly, Melbourne Drive doesn't "join" the freeway for some time, and it used to access the service station. I have added points for the road signs, and adjusted the street types accordingly. Dian |
| 119093902 | over 3 years ago | Reverted in 119151901 - this edit based on questionable licensing status of notes from anonymous, per Discord conversation. road names appear unable to be sourced with licensed data. |
| 119093920 | over 3 years ago | Reverted in 119151901 - this edit based on questionable licensing status of notes from anonymous, per Discord conversation. road names appear unable to be sourced with licensed data. |
| 119093947 | over 3 years ago | Reverted in 119151901 - this edit based on questionable licensing status of notes from anonymous, per Discord conversation. road names appear unable to be sourced with licensed data. |
| 119094031 | over 3 years ago | Reverted in 119151901 - this edit based on questionable licensing status of notes from anonymous, per Discord conversation. road names appear unable to be sourced with licensed data. |
| 119094402 | over 3 years ago | Reverted in 119151901 - this edit based on questionable licensing status of notes from anonymous, per Discord conversation. road names appear unable to be sourced with licensed data. |
| 119094459 | over 3 years ago | Reverted in 119151901 - this edit based on questionable licensing status of notes from anonymous, per Discord conversation. road names appear unable to be sourced with licensed data. |
| 119094490 | over 3 years ago | Reverted in 119151901 - this edit based on questionable licensing status of notes from anonymous, per Discord conversation. road names appear unable to be sourced with licensed data. |
| 119094563 | over 3 years ago | Reverted in 119151901 - this edit based on questionable licensing status of notes from anonymous, per Discord conversation. road names appear unable to be sourced with licensed data. |
| 119095201 | over 3 years ago | Reverted in 119151901 - this edit based on questionable licensing status of notes from anonymous, per Discord conversation. road names appear unable to be sourced with licensed data. |
| 119095281 | over 3 years ago | Reverted in 119151901 - this edit based on questionable licensing status of notes from anonymous, per Discord conversation. road names appear unable to be sourced with licensed data. |
| 119095290 | over 3 years ago | Reverted in 119151901 - this edit based on questionable licensing status of notes from anonymous, per Discord conversation. road names appear unable to be sourced with licensed data. |
| 119095985 | over 3 years ago | Reverted in 119151901 - this edit based on questionable licensing status of notes from anonymous, per Discord conversation. road names appear unable to be sourced with licensed data. |
| 119096157 | over 3 years ago | Reverted in 119151901 - this edit based on questionable licensing status of notes from anonymous, per Discord conversation. road names appear unable to be sourced with licensed data. |