Hey Chonker!

Impressive detail work, as always.

I'm curious though, what was the reason for splitting the carriageways at Partridge Cres and Buxton Cres, as there doesn't seem to be any physical separation?

Dian
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117065625

Hey Immortal Boredom!

Thanks for the edit around the McClelland Drive area!

I noticed the way that you've modelled the roundabout at McClelland and Skye means that traffic from the forestry area can't go onto the roundabout; they would be forced to turn left. Would you be able to link the road with the roundabout junction?

It has also left a traffic island node sitting on it's own that can probably be deleted. :)

Dian
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116986338

Hey Immortal Boredom!

Thanks for the edit around the McClelland Drive area!

I noticed the way that you've modelled the roundabout at McClelland and Skye means that traffic from the forestry area can't go onto the roundabout; they would be forced to turn left. Would you be able to link the road with the roundabout junction?

It has also left a traffic island node sitting on it's own that can probably be deleted. :)

Dian
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116986338

Thanks for confirming Cassie.

I have moved the node for the physiotherapist to their new address.

Dian

Hey Leon,

This appears to be a descriptive name you've added to this drivethrough. It's not a street with that name gazetted. osm.wiki/Naming_conventions#Don.27t_describe_things_using_name_tag

I've removed it accordingly.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116888548

Hello,

It appears that you were trying to relocate the physiotherapist that was at this location; you've accidentally changed the address of the building where they presumably used to be.

I will correct it for you now, let me know if you have any other questions or concerns.

Hey mate,

I've done some research and now know much more than I did previously about helicopter operations!

The markings on the east of Bentinck Street are a "aiming point": https://www.icao.int/APAC/Meetings/2016%20Annex14VII/ICAO%20Bangkok%204-2016%20Visual%20Aids.pdf

Helicopters don't set down there, but descend until they cross the road. I've altered the tags for the aiming point accordingly. :)

I've also added an additional tag to the taxiway: taxiway=air, to indicate that this is a "special" taxiway.

Let me know what you think. :)

No problem at all.

It's okay if you don't feel like this particular place is suitable for the emergency landing site tag; there is always some grey in the wiki. :) I appreciate you saying that some of the others can be retagged.

OSM is addictive. :) If you are feeling social, I'd encourage you to join the talk-au mailing list. It's a cool group of people. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Hello again!

This is a really unique helipad! I think you've done a pretty good job tagging it here.

It's not 100% right to have a taxiway there, as helicopters seem to just hover over road itself, but I don't believe there is a better tag. We can always create a brand new tag for it; do you have any ideas or knowledge that could help?

Good work. :)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116517384

Hello!

Thanks so much for your edits so far. I can see you're really busy in some areas of the state that don't tend to get a lot of attention!

I noticed you've created quite a few helipads in remote areas. The tagging system for helipads can be a bit unconventional, but some of these helipads look to be designated emergency landing sites. Rather than aeroway=helipad, I'd suggest emergency=landing_site is a more appropriate alternative. emergency=landing_site

Happy to help out further if needed; keep up the good work! :)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116517557

That sounds like an excellent plan, thanks Michael :)

Hey Michael.

It was pretty confusing trying to establish the actual definition of the Bay Trail.

My starting point was the official government datasources (namely, VICNAMES and Vicmap Transport) which show the Bay Trail taking a sharp left at the Cenotaph and ending at Beach Road.

This is obviously different to the previous version of OSM, where Bay Trail extended all the way to the Mordialloc Creek Trail in George Woods Reserve (and across the punt, but that's not relevant to this! :))

I did a lot of googling, which didn't particularly help.

The Wikipedia article for the trail seems to think that the Bay Trail starts near Seaford railway station, but after checking the sources there I believe that the article conflates the formally gazetted "Bay Trail" with a network of trails that are connected across the bay (Seaford Wetlands, Mordi Creek, Dandy Creek, etc).

Most council publications or cycle routes didn't list the names of each trail, or at least didn't clearly show where each one started and ended.

Failing all that, I fell back on KartaView/Mapillary imagery. Nepean is too far away to capture any signage, and there was only two trails I could find on the footpath were six years old and facing the west, so would not have shown any sign on for those heading towards Mordialloc.

I'm very interested that there is a signpost that I might have missed; I guess the question then would turn to where Bay stops and the Mordialloc Creek trail starts?

Hey Michael,

I changed the two driveways you had tagged as highway=track to be highway=service, as this looked to be what you intended. Apologies if I've made an incorrect assumption.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116318331

Partial Revert of boundary nodes in (116209290), see 93359799 comment

Partial Revert of boundary nodes in (116209290), see 93359799 comment

Partial Revert of boundary nodes in (116209290), see 93359799 comment

Partial Revert of boundary nodes in (116209290), see 93359799 comment

Partial Revert of boundary nodes in (116209290), see 93359799 comment

Partial Revert of boundary nodes in (116209290), see 93359799 comment

Partial Revert of boundary nodes in (116209290), see 93359799 comment