If the runway's still there but no longer in use, tagging it using one of the lifecycle prefixes such as "disused" or "abandoned" (osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix) may be a better option.

Aerial imagery here shows something that looks an awful lot like a runway. Is there something I'm missing that says "Regan Ranch Airport" doesn't exist?

Why have you tagged the bank of the Spokane River as being a river in its own right?

The correct way to mark proposed roads is with the "proposed=residential" tag (proposed=*). There doesn't appear to be an easy way to do this with the iD editor, though.

Marking them as actual roads will lead to navigation software trying to route users down them ("In 300 feet, turn right onto Proposed").

I don't care what language is used for the contents of the "name" field, so long as 1) it's just a single language, 2) it's just a single name, and 3) the name reflects one of the things it's called.

I noticed you've named a few roads "Unconfirmed Rd". The "name" field shouldn't be used for anything except the name of the object. If you want to add a note that you're not sure a road exists, the best way is to add a "fixme=resurvey" ("Fix Me" from the "Add Field" dropdown in the iD editor). You may also want to change the road type to the generic "highway=road" (a road type of "Unknown Road" in iD).

Both of these options will flag the road for further investigation in various quality-assurance tools, something that a name change won't do.

Are you sure about the east-west runway here? In the latest Mapbox imagery, it looks like it may have been abandoned and re-vegetated.

Please don't make joke edits.

Unfortunately, Maps.Me is out of date. I did some basic mapping of the shopping mall there two months ago, including that Burger King; Maps.Me hasn't picked up the changes yet.

If you've got an address, opening hours, or similar information, feel free to add them and I'll integrate it with the existing data.

I'm not sure what you were trying to do, but I seriously doubt that the city limits of Speed, KS are a pipeline. I've reverted the change.

Thanks for confirming it.

Are the speed limits on Five Mile the result of an on-the-ground check? My experience is that roads out in the county are typically either 25 MPH or 35 MPH (or faster); 30 MPH is rare.

Is there a reason why you created this Value Village again?

This is the second time you've marked a castle where there clearly isn't one. Is there a reason for this?

I'm not sure what you were trying to do here, but it left US-95 tangled up, with the northbound and southbound sections crossing over each other and running the wrong way at the intersection with Hidden Haven/1st/North Llumina. I've done my best to fix it.

I re-surveyed the area today, and could not find any evidence of the upper section of the trail. Given the continued absence of evidence that that part of the trail exists, I'm removing it.

Two points about this edit:

1) Streams need to point in the direction of flow. You've got the lower section of Hog Creek flowing uphill.

2) Where did you get the data for the trail to the outlet of Hog Creek? My notes from my hike yesterday don't show a trail junction there, and there's nothing obviously trail-like in the aerial photographs of the section near the main trail.

Removed "Nes=Cartridge" tagging from seven buildings in this set.

Removed "Nes=Cartridge" tagging from 54 buildings in this set.

Is there a reason why you added "Nes=Cartridge" tags to 179 buildings in this changeset?