I didn't change name, I changed name:en. The park authority does not have the power to change the English language. I was in Eryri/Snowdonia recently and I can confirm it's still called Snowdonia when people are speaking English.

Good question... Unfortunately I didn't note that specifically, I only know it's going to be a Hilton from local knowledge, which I guess is why it's already labelled on here.

I found some consultation or something about it too, but I couldn't work out if it had actually been accepted and changed. Now I can't seem to find anything on the MK council website.

I know all about the landowners who confronted us when we tried to cross many years ago...

I have emailed the council for clarification.

Is Emberton BW19 definitely a thing now? I've been keeping an eye on this for many years now and I saw that there was some kind of recent action opening this way. But it's not on the MK definitive map yet.

If so, I would suggest it's still a highway=service as it's paved and goes through the middle of a farm yard. Unless, of course, it has changed on the ground recently.

Is the Old Bedford River at Earith really intermittent rather than tidal? As far as I know it doesn't completely dry up and I thought the river was known to be tidal as far as Earith?

Salt marsh seems an odd choice here. From what I remember of Mersea, when the tide's out it's all mud. Salt marshes lie above the mean high water level, they can't be below the beach.

Did you perhaps mean to change a smaller area to saltmarsh?

I've reverted Grove Road Pizza Hut back to fast_food as this is a takeaway type Pizza Hut, not a restaurant.

The wiki says disused means "Not currently available for use, but could be reinstated easily". That was the closest lifecycle prefix I could find (osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix)

I agree it doesn't seem quite right, but I wasn't aware of the conditional restrictions.

Oh dear, well spotted. I have removed these extra ways in changeset/78282423. It was due to forgetting that I had an in-progress edit in JOSM that I started last night to improve the coastline of The Wash.

I would also like to query whether tagging the viaduct in Huntingdon as "removed:highway=trunk" is correct. The viaduct is (presumably) still there today, so it should still be on the map, but tagged with access=no and maybe just highway=service.

This appears to be inside a private office building. Is the fast food outlet publicly accessible?

It's a bus_guideway without guide kerbs. It's not a highway=service. No way. It doesn't feel like one at all. It has car traps. It has special signage and junctions all the way down.

I put a tag guide_kerb=no so that we don't lose the information about the presence or absence of guide kerbs. This conveys much more about the reality of what these ways are, in my opinion.

Someone watches Geoff Marshall's videos, I see. What about the stiles?

Hi! Do you have a source for "Harvey's House"?

Was there a mistake with the naming of this station? node/1643615541

Hi,

Could you please add the source to boundaries like this using the source tag? I'm assuming it's the Natural England dataset, but it's unclear at the moment.

See, for example, The Wash nature reserve: relation/9726613#map=11/52.8461/0.2077

Thanks!

Thanks for the clarification.

I think given what you've said and having reread the Wiki page on the access key that this is tagged correctly then.

Do you have more information about this? Who owns this section of road? Could we add that information to the operator tag?

motor_vehicle=permissive is OK, I think. Maybe I misread it earlier but I thought it was motor_vehicle=destination.

Access=no on the A20 to channel tunnel link is surely wrong? It looks like a normal public highway. The fact that it only goes to the channel tunnel doesn't make it access=no. Routing algorithms won't use this link to get to the channel tunnel now.