10992's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 147707256 | almost 2 years ago | Note that aerial imagery was unclear, so building shape is approximate |
| 140203474 | over 2 years ago | |
| 140203474 | over 2 years ago | In the end, I've uploaded the photos to Geograph at the link below. I think there may be a delay before they're generally available. I'll replace the link on the memorial `node`. https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/7574358
|
| 140203474 | over 2 years ago | I'll look into uploading it to Wikimedia Commons myself, since I took it. |
| 140203474 | over 2 years ago | Note that the image linked from node/11135114575 (https://westnordost.de/p/161458.jpg) is not stable, now the note is closed, the image will eventually be deleted. |
| 131278383 | almost 3 years ago | |
| 125239967 | about 3 years ago | Hello, I noticed you've made a two successive changes to relation/12524970 whereby you added the flat numbers with the addr:housenumber tag. This tag is to be used for housenumbers, which relate to the street. For flat numbers, where they relate to the building, you should use addr:flats (addr:flats=*). Also, you have put so many individual numbers that they do not fit, since the size of tag/keys is limited. I would suggest probably leaving the "D" off the numbers, and just using a range, since the D is already contained in the addr:housename. I've carried out the relevant correction in changeset/127058372, if you know the range of flat numbers, you should add this. I'm not currently in a position to survey it myself. |