OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
142678018 about 2 years ago

I have already had issues with this user making incorrect changesets and they never responded to my comments or concerns. Very frustrating.

142244107 about 2 years ago

Hi, I noticed you made some suspicious looking edits and added some things that do not exist. I understand that maybe you are inexperienced but please do not add in tunnels and roads unless you confirm that they exist from the ground. Many aerial imagery might not be up to date and could contain incorrect information. Please also put more of a description so people know what you are doing. Thanks :)

142244107 about 2 years ago

This is vandalism.

141968279 about 2 years ago

Hello! Just for future reference, when tagging exit "names", use the "destination=" tag on the exit way, instead of putting the "name=" tag on the motorway_junction node. I have gone back and fixed that for you in changeset #141994423. You can also look at the OpenStreetMap wiki page for "Tag:highway=motorway_junction" for more information on how to map that. Anyway, Cheers to the opening of the ring road! Have a great day :)

136174359 over 2 years ago

Is this correct mapping practice? This is a 2-storey parking garage, so I had previously marked two roads with the above ones tagged as layer=1. I'm not sure if it's appropriate to merge both upper floor and lower floor into a single way. At least, that's what I understood from the wiki. Cheers

123456789 over 3 years ago

awesome changeset number :D

116746963 over 3 years ago

encountered this after coming across an out of place bilingual road in Calgary and went in to correct it. Weird edits from this person

119800887 over 3 years ago

alright, changeset #120104531 has it now changed to what it was before. I left the main tags (landuse=grass, leisure=dog_park, operator name) on the site relation along with the name, but also added those three tags to each way. should be correct now.

119800887 over 3 years ago

they are pretty much identical in the real world, but that's a good point so I will change it back. Thanks

119800887 over 3 years ago

okay, see changeset #120074711 for the change. Changed it from site relation to a multipolygon, and transferred the tags into the relation itself including the dog park one . Should be good to go

119800887 over 3 years ago

The relation is not tagged this way, but each individual section has been. I will go and change it from site to multipolygon so I can tag it properly.

120000000 over 3 years ago

cool changeset number!