https://openstreetmap.org/copyright | https://openstreetmap.org |
Copyright OpenStreetMap and contributors, under an open license |
https://openstreetmap.org/copyright | https://openstreetmap.org |
Copyright OpenStreetMap and contributors, under an open license |
Almost nothing in neighboring courtyards was shrub. Replaced most of it with `natural=wood`.
Added missing paths, disconnected existing ones from grass.
Not sure what "cut around" means here.
By "cut around" I meant that grass is overlapping footways, which should ideally end where the paved surface begins like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/648797196 or something. This is a systematic problem in most of these places as the grass was drawn before aerial was good enough to trace anything more.
Cut grass around paved paths. I assumed that it is OK for unpaved ones to be in grass. And that trees in `natural=wood` are OK to be on top of any paths.
If the paths are informal and just cut across the grass, then I usually leave them on the grass - I think that's fine.
Wood (thick tree cover) indeed doesn't really have an exact border unless there is something clearly there - and even then, mappers draw areas over each other often. This really varies by location, land use, mapper, etc.
One thing - grass as physical land cover should generally not overlap other physical land cover like wood. I adjusted these.
Anyway, looks good, thanks.