https://openstreetmap.org/copyright | https://openstreetmap.org |
Copyright OpenStreetMap and contributors, under an open license |
https://openstreetmap.org/copyright | https://openstreetmap.org |
Copyright OpenStreetMap and contributors, under an open license |
Yes, it opened on 18 February - I walk past here once a week.
However, there's such a confusing array of different imagery offsets used around here on adjacent buildings and highways, that I don't know what's correct or where to begin to improve the *current* complicated layout.
To me it looks like Esri World Imagery is the most up to date, but yeah, a bit offset and not the best quality.
If you can't trace the building you can just add a single node for the shop, and the building can be traced later.
I'd add the following tags at least:
brand:wikidata=Q151954
brand:wikipedia=en:Lidl
brand=Lidl
name=Lidl
shop=supermarket
Yes Esri World and both Maxar layers are all now the same and the most up-to-date. I'll just add a node for the shop now as it's the simplest.
What I meant in my previous comment was I don't know what *offset* is correct.
Just looking at Bing (because it's the clearest):
- The buildings to the north and the street to the west are aligned to Bing without any offset
- The street to the south has a -4.5m,0m offset
- The building to the east has a -4.5m,-8.5m offset
There's a new footpath layout through the Lidl site which connects them all, and I can't work out which offset to use. Maybe older Bing imagery had different offsets?
Added (as best I could from photo survey) in changeset 101602154