https://openstreetmap.org/copyright | https://openstreetmap.org |
Copyright OpenStreetMap and contributors, under an open license |
https://openstreetmap.org/copyright | https://openstreetmap.org |
Copyright OpenStreetMap and contributors, under an open license |
referenced by discussion in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58378215
I was debating myself some weeks ago if I should re-open it, but Andrej/Andrey did so, perhaps as part of the Ukrainian firm's review of their work or else because of the unconnected street.
I presume you added the connection now where I guessed from the Mapbox aerial imaginary it should be, so I would say this probably can be closed, unless the UA team has an internal reason to keep it active still for a while.
there is a second note where you worked that is also open, presumably for review (I checked who opened it and his text explains the connection), but I figured I should comment here as it goes against your goal of a note-free Californication, or at least one where actionable notes don't get lost in the jungle (I did NYC a couple days ago and was surprised how many I could close after previous passes, and like almost all my note janitorial duty, that is without even editing the map).