https://openstreetmap.org/copyright | https://openstreetmap.org |
Copyright OpenStreetMap and contributors, under an open license |
https://openstreetmap.org/copyright | https://openstreetmap.org |
Copyright OpenStreetMap and contributors, under an open license |
It's a big letter "A" at the edge of the town, if I remember correctly.
Ah, indeed, see https://goo.gl/maps/rinYZtS4MET2
I think about using man_made=welcome_sign, would it be OK?
Or maybe you have some better idea?
It has zero usages on taginfo, so this would essentially hide it, resulting in some other mapper adding another point. There is a board_type=welcome_sign, but this does not look like a board.
In my experience, mapping welcome signs as attractions is a common practice (outside Western Europe at least). Why do you think this needs to be changed?
Why it would hide anything? Any sensible data consumer will ignore unknown tags.
Obviously, I will not delete tourism=attraction tag (I am mapping remotely and I have no idea is it local attraction).
"It has zero usages on taginfo" - well, any tag started from that.
"Why do you think this needs to be changed?" - sole tourism=attraction gives absolutely no information what is mapped here and always should have "real" tag.