Changeset: 86307566
Various changes and additions around Chorleywood, mainly to paths but also other features
Closed by plunet
Tags
changesets_count | 26 |
---|---|
created_by | iD 2.17.3 |
host | https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit |
imagery_used | Bing aerial imagery |
locale | en |
resolved:crossing_ways:highway-highway | 4 |
resolved:crossing_ways:highway-waterway | 2 |
resolved:disconnected_way:highway | 2 |
resolved:outdated_tags:deprecated_tags | 2 |
Discussion
-
Comment from BCNorwich
Hi,
You've made a lot of duplicated highways by placing a new highway on top of an existing way, please see here :-https://tinyurl.com/y9zlrvj3If a way needs amending or correcting please amend or correct the existing way. You also ought not delete the existing way to draw a new way in it's place as this destroys the history of the existing way.
If you need help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.
-
Comment from plunet
Thanks for the feedback Bernard. I've corrected a few of the issues you highlighted. However I'm struggling to understand what I did wrong (or even it it was my change) on Way 103560825 and Way 74143531
-
Comment from BCNorwich
Hi,
Sorry I didn't realise you were making amendments to the problems.I've already removed the part of your new path, (Way: 813584762) that was placed on top of Way 103560825 duplicating it. So your duplication cannot now be seen.
It's a similar situation at Way 74143531.On now checking the area I see your new Way: 802294781 is joined to the admin boundary line instead of Shepherd's Lane. I've not amended this so that you can see the problem.
May I say that a lot of contributors are trying to make prow_ref tagging consistent across the country. Please see :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Rjw62/PRoW_Tagging
Such as Parish Name, Type Code (FP, BR, RB, BY), Number. The authority number if if in a different format can be placed in the ref tag. So for example prow_ref=Chorleywood FP 30
ref=CW30I think with joining the path onto Shepherd's Lane these problems are corrected.
Regards Bernard.
-
Comment from plunet
OK brilliant, I've corrected 802294781. Also understood about the best way to label the footpaths; When I have time I'm going to go back through the Chorleywood Footpaths and put stiles and gates in where I am able to and I'll correct the prow_ref's then. Most of the FPs round here are signed with their CW path reference. Thanks for the feedback, I'm sure to make a few more mistakes!
- 813621588, v1
- 813621589, v1
- 813621590, v1
- CW19 (813621591), v1
- CW25/RK18 (813621592), v1
- 813621593, v1
- 813621594, v1
- RK11 (813621595), v1
- 813621596, v1
- CP7 (813621597), v1
- RK13 (813621598), v1
- RK20 (813621599), v1
- RK24 (813621600), v1
- RK23 (813621601), v1
- RK25 (813621602), v1
- CW13 (813621603), v1
- CW5 (813621604), v1
- CW4 (813621605), v1
- RK29 (813621606), v1
- CX1 (813621607), v1
Relations (4)
Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use under an open license.
Hosting is supported by Fastly, OSMF corporate members, and other partners.
https://openstreetmap.org/copyright | https://openstreetmap.org |
Copyright OpenStreetMap and contributors, under an open license |