Changeset: 60231364
Removing Extraneous Walkways, when they are really sidewalks, and part of the existing roads marked.
Closed by TEG24601
Tags
changesets_count | 115 |
---|---|
created_by | iD 2.9.1 |
host | https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit |
imagery_used | Bing aerial imagery |
locale | en-US |
Discussion
-
Comment from Glassman
Can you explain why you removed the footways? These appear to be valid sidewalks.
---
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60231364
-
Comment from TEG24601
Every single one of them is a sidewalk and included as part of the street themselves. Adding them as separate walkways clutters the map and makes it more difficult to use.
-
Comment from Glassman
Check out the OpenSidewalks.com initiative. The goal is to have a fully navigable sidewalk network. A number of cities have started mapping their sidewalk network into osm, including Seattle, Bellevue, Austin, and Santa Clara.
While it may appear "cluttered" they are verifiable objects and can be mapped. I would appreciate it if you could either revert or undo your edits.
-
Comment from bhousel
I've reverted this change in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60288925 - TEG24601, please do not delete other people's data because you think it makes the map "cluttered".
Ways (5)
Nodes (101-102 of 102)
Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use under an open license.
Hosting is supported by Fastly, OSMF corporate members, and other partners.
https://openstreetmap.org/copyright | https://openstreetmap.org |
Copyright OpenStreetMap and contributors, under an open license |