Changeset: 51069071
Nottingham: sidewalks, shops, building's levels; fixed existed errors. Chatsworth: statues, ways
Closed by VlIvYur
Tags
created_by | JOSM/1.5 (12450 en) |
---|---|
source | survey, bing 20110422-20120909 |
Discussion
-
Comment from SK53
I realise this changeset was mainly fixing minor errors, but it's rather difficult to review the changes when the area covered is so large.
Changes like converting existing areas to multipolygons can be quite confusing, because one sees tags deleted from ways.
Lastly I note one or two over corrections: I added tree-row to lines of trees because it is non-trivial to identify such things using geographical position on its own; the note on the gallery was appropriate whereas description is not (the actual archives are located elsewhere & someone may then intrepret the description as saying this is the location of the archives).
-
Comment from SomeoneElse
I'd agree with SK53 about relation usage here - certainly mapping https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7467686 as a relation is overcomplicated and misuses a fence as part of it. If there's a fence, map that; if there's a leisure area map that too (using the same nodes if appropriate). To map something like this is a relation creates a "write-only" map that it is impossible to edit and invites breakage when, for example, someone wants to add a gap in the fence.
-
Comment from VlIvYur
Returned note for archive.
Relations: that was I said SomeoneElse before: it's hard to find right way if there are many ways over the same points. If you want write-once without multipolygons try to edit around Nottigham railway station.
Breakage was before me: someone made mini golf unclosed without using relations. And I just missed the fence when cut it.
Returned Park to line with tags, split the fence - corrected mini golf.
If you want a (wide) gap in the fence: add two points, split fence, remove tags from the gap. If it is an entrance, just add one point with barrier=entrance or gate. And all of this without editing relationtree_row I didn't understand why it's needed if all trees were mapped. It was necessary to decide that you need tree_row or row of trees
I'll try not to leave city in one changeset
-
Comment from SK53
Late to the day, but you also changed shop=mobile_phone to office=telecommunication which is just wrong.
-
Comment from VlIvYur
Where?
-
Comment from SK53
Actually not a change but an addition on Clumber Street Nottingham (since corrected)
Ways (1-20 of 210)
- Waterway Street (10689040), v6
- 12342743, v55
- Willoughby Close (12358209), v15
- Cut Through Lane (16319127), v51
- 16533193, v12
- 16533219, v9
- 16533383, v11
- Carrington Street (16566642), v17
- 22323437, v10
- 23060125, v9
- 23060127, v6
- 23060130, v8
- 23060132, v7
- 23060134, v4
- 23312706, v24
- Chatsworth House (28011568), v8
- 43446093, v2
- 43446118, v2
- 7 (46692688), v7
- Jubilee Avenue (46820987), v10
Relations (14)
Nodes (1-20 of 355)
- 112153964, v42
- 114930189, v12
- 170295225, v12
- 170296173, v35
- 197586432, v10
- 221641526, v7
- 221642123, v23
- 221642124, v6
- 221642568, v22
- 229716306, v24
- 240011638, v5
- 252307802, v5
252397792, v21- 539715109, v6
- 548030327, v4
- 612044694, v4
- 778519000, v3
- 863980342, v3
- 863980393, v4
- Weston Gallery (984089754), v3
Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use under an open license.
Hosting is supported by Fastly, OSMF corporate members, and other partners.
https://openstreetmap.org/copyright | https://openstreetmap.org |
Copyright OpenStreetMap and contributors, under an open license |