Changeset: 149827539
should'nt have been removed in the first place
Closed by slice0
Tags
changesets_count | 5056 |
---|---|
created_by | osm-revert 1.3.7.240408 |
revert:id | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149522767 |
website | https://revert.monicz.dev |
Discussion
-
Comment from SomeoneElse
Hello,
What actually is the benefit of the "junction=yes" tagging on e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1839949101 ?
Best Regards,
Andy -
Comment from slice0
well first of all "Remove junction=yes in SA where it's not needed due to no other tags on the junction" is not against any rule or policy. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction=yes I mainly just place them at y intersections where a "straight" command could be used for either direction here is one example https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1003369358 this one is a 3 way split https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2521837104 , they mainly just help clear confussion in the real world sense. On principal I dont beleive the perfectly valid nodes should be questioned rather the "made up" reason for their removal
thankyou
-
Comment from SomeoneElse
I don't understand "they mainly just help clear confussion in the real world sense."
What actually is the benefit of the "junction=yes" tagging?
-
Comment from slice0
confusion I meant, they are helpful for routing. in certain scenarios, a gps may confuse a straight with a turn when there is just a slight difference of angle. Besides that they are fine to be there based on the wiki unless im missing something?
-
Comment from fortera_au
The wiki says that junction=yes by itself is pointless, it doesn't indicate anything. Tagging junction=yes means just as much as the bare node itself.
If you want to indicate directions, you need more than that, which is what a manoeuvre relation can be used for. Without having information about which ways are actually joined, how can any kind of routing algorithm know what is actually meant?
---
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149827539
-
Comment from fortera_au
Since the wiki page for junction=yes does explicitly say these nodes are incorrectly tagged, I do plan to re-revert these nodes, unless someone can provide a reason not to.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149827539
-
Comment from fortera_au
I'll just mention the reviewed_bad from OSMCHA was another user, it just seems to add that to any comment added from there once that's been set by any user.
-
Comment from slice0
because they were deleted again I have reverted the deletion and reported the user for vandalism for deleting perfectly fine data from the map. based on lack of understanding the wiki page. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150094405
- Comment from SomeoneElse
Nodes (13)
Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use under an open license.
Hosting is supported by Fastly, OSMF corporate members, and other partners.
https://openstreetmap.org/copyright | https://openstreetmap.org |
Copyright OpenStreetMap and contributors, under an open license |