Changeset: 148999561
not a classic pedestrian road... rather an agricultural road... wide... no sign of any ban. So good for bikes as well...
Closed by Eino81
Tags
changesets_count | 1693 |
---|---|
created_by | iD 2.28.1 |
host | https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit |
imagery_used | Czechia CUZK orthophoto |
locale | hu |
Discussion
-
Comment from Piskvor
If it's more of an agricultural track, then it would be better to tag it as such (highway=track, tracktype=... https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tracktype ). That way, it's allowed for pretty much anyone.
Tagging "this is a pedestrian road that bicycles are also legally (bicycle=yes) permitted to use" is something quite diffferent, e.g. this: https://mapy.cz/zakladni?pano=1&q=ruzynska&source=stre&id=119552&pid=96206140&newest=1&yaw=0.842&fov=1.468&pitch=0.340&x=14.3211709&y=50.0813739&ds=2&z=16&ovl=8
The expectation of highway=footway,bicycle=yes is "paved, separated from motorized traffic." highway=track is, without other tagging, "unpaved, free-for-all".
Retagged this.
-
Comment from Eino81
I did not want to update that to.an agricultural road, because the southern end at the bike road is not fit for cars. It is like a wide path rather... I did not see any cars entering to that "road". Hard to categorize...
-
Comment from Piskvor
Updated the southern end to path. If the character of the way changes, it's okay to split the way and make different changes to each new part.
-
Comment from Eino81
Thx, it is better now.
Ways (1)
Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use under an open license.
Hosting is supported by Fastly, OSMF corporate members, and other partners.
https://openstreetmap.org/copyright | https://openstreetmap.org |
Copyright OpenStreetMap and contributors, under an open license |