Changeset: 148224002
Setting these forests as "multilinestring" for now so it can be easily restored if the future drawn forests are somehow worse (a better solution rather than delete all)
Closed by Tommy Hoang Long
Tags
created_by | reverter_plugin/36196;JOSM/1.5 (18969 en) |
---|
Discussion
-
Comment from user_14538650
I don't think that's a better solution and it is a misuse of linestrings. Again, the reason why I've deleted the forests is because not everything inside the national parks are forests, and there are substantial patches of wetland and grassland inside of national parks. Also, there are some existing mapstyles that use "green" as the boundary of the national parks, not forests, such as OSM americana (https://zelonewolf.github.io/openstreetmap-americana/). There is little benefit from keeping these relations and I urge you to delete them.
-
Comment from Tommy Hoang Long
As said in the changeset summary, this is just temporary. These multiline strings won't even appear in the map when people browse it.
If your newly drawn forests are better, then these will be eventually deleted after you finish drawing the forests by next week. But if the new forests you create is somehow worse, then I will use these multiline strings to recover the old versions of the forests.
Also, three things to consider before you even shout out the arguments "deleting because not everything in the national parks are forests" to justify yourself next time:
1. Really take a look at that example of Clarence Fahnestock Memorial State Park that I pointed out. None of those forests are erroneous. The issue that you pointed out (not everything in NPs are forests) indicates that those forests are not 100% accurate. Not 100% accurate doesn't mean erroneous. Many sea/ocean relations are not 100% accurate because there are some islands missing (which people haven't drawn), why not delete all of those oceans? You have made me repeat this statement for the 3rd time already, and I don't really want to do it the 4th time.
2. Were the members of every deleted forests and national park relations exactly the same? In the case of Nam Cat Tien area, that forest you deleted clearly included some natural lakes as it inner, while the national park boundary does not.
3. You deleted even a massive piece of forest along Dong Nai River (from Lam Dong's Cat Tien District all the way to Di Linh District), despite only a small section of it has Cat Tien NP boundaries. -
Comment from user_14538650
Sorry about the revert. I have misunderstood your intentions. I think it's time to map the forest then.
- 318809258, v16
- 477806068, v6
- 477806077, v6
- 477806078, v7
- 477806079, v7
- 477806096, v7
- 477806107, v6
- 477806117, v7
- 477809462, v6
- 478445731, v8
- 479647789, v8
- 479647794, v6
- 479647795, v6
- 481603564, v22
- 483475449, v6
- 483475462, v6
- 485616508, v8
- 485616512, v8
- 485616517, v8
- 598499343, v7
Relations (13)
- 7145524, v7
- 16894115, v15
- 17143324, v10
- 17147346, v7
- 17149941, v8
- 17150016, v5
- 17150678, v11
- Rừng Chàng Riệc (17150819), v5
- 17151365, v6
- 17165362, v9
- 17190034, v7
- 17190035, v6
- 17190036, v5
- 11597596961, v5
- 11597596962, v5
- 11597596963, v5
- 11597596964, v5
- 11597596965, v5
- 11597596966, v5
- 11597596967, v5
- 11597596968, v5
- 11597606369, v5
- 11597606370, v5
- 11597606371, v5
- 11597606372, v5
- 11597606373, v5
- 11597606374, v5
- 11597606375, v5
- 11597606376, v5
- 11597606377, v5
- 11597606378, v5
- 11597606379, v5
- 11597606380, v5
Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use under an open license.
Hosting is supported by Fastly, OSMF corporate members, and other partners.
https://openstreetmap.org/copyright | https://openstreetmap.org |
Copyright OpenStreetMap and contributors, under an open license |