Changeset: 131387598
All edits have been made as per an Organised Edit Programme agreed with OSM, and in consultation with National Trust rangers and gardeners. For more info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/National_Trust_Paths
Closed by Olivia Ragone
Tags
changesets_count | 69 |
---|---|
created_by | iD 2.23.2 |
host | https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit |
imagery_used | Bing Maps Aerial;OpenStreetMap (Occitan Style) |
locale | en-GB |
resolved:crossing_ways:highway-highway | 4 |
warnings:mismatched_geometry:line_as_vertex | 2 |
Discussion
-
Comment from DaveF
Hi
Are you sure this is a public footpath? It doesn't have a PROW reference.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1132923329
Please don't use highway=path. It was created by people who didn't understand the highway hierarchy. Use 'footway' instead.
There's no requirement to explicitly add motor_vehicle=no etc as 'footway' automatically excludes modes other than walking.
Have these paths been removed?
https://snipboard.io/4tAoUz.jpgBottom of path:
https://snipboard.io/zrcu4M.jpgOn the path looking down at Serpentine Lake
https://snipboard.io/cw20DE.jpgAt top of path looking back at car park:
https://snipboard.io/L0q7K2.jpg -
Comment from DaveF
Hello again
When amending footways please don't miss out steps & bridges.Have these two PROWs refs been removed from BathNES's database & has the route been officially realigned?
https://snipboard.io/8t5ibN.jpgIs there a reason you've split this into an individual way?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1132923306Has this PROW been officially realigned?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1132923334What's wrong with this footway?
https://snipboard.io/yDwmHs.jpg -
Comment from DaveF
Please do not attached ways going under bridges to those bridges. They are at different levels.
Do not unnecessarily split ways.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10562962454You've duplicated a stile node.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10562962483/historyDo not split ways unless there is a difference in tags
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1132923321You've created 3 spurious/duplicating kissing gates & unnecessarily split an access land polygon
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10562962486/history#map=19/51.36692/-2.34257Similar here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10562962471and here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10562962474Do you have a reason why this changeset shouldn't be reverted?
-
Comment from DaveF
Hi
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/549011487
Please don't add additional footways directly to stiles etc as it means routers will assume a walker has to cross the stile to walk around the field, which is obviously incorrect.
Ways (1-20 of 179)
Relations (3)
Nodes (121-129 of 129)
Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use under an open license.
Hosting is supported by Fastly, OSMF corporate members, and other partners.
https://openstreetmap.org/copyright | https://openstreetmap.org |
Copyright OpenStreetMap and contributors, under an open license |