Richard's Notes
Notes submitted or commented on by Richard
« Previous | Page 3 | Next »
Id | Creator | Description | Created at | Last changed | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3034521 | Richard | New cycleway just opened here (part of NCN 55) |
|||
982680 | Richard | Mapped as discrete cycleway here when I think it's just a shoulder |
|||
431326 | Richard | A couple of sources (e.g. http://www.ridgeroute.com/news.php) suggest that the Ridge Route is open to walkers and cyclists, though not to cars - "You are allowed to walk, hike, or bicycle in, just no motorized vehicles". Is this the case? If so, I guess it would be good to add "bicycle=yes" etc. to amend the current "access=no". |
|||
1093216 | Richard | Didn't think the Thames Path here was a public bridleway - needs checking. |
|||
92685 | Richard | NCN numbering is a bit screwed up along on this whole length - the ncn_ref tags say one thing, the relations say another. I _think_ it's NCN 66 along the towpath from Leeds to Shipley, which then heads south; NCN 696 continues along the towpath; and NCN 69 takes over at Keighley after arriving from the south (on an incomplete section). But it really needs survey and everything moving into route relations. |
|||
416927 | Richard | River meander has been cut off since original NHD data - this is quite wrong |
|||
1947382 | Richard | Eurovelo route now goes this way and not via D932a |
|||
959788 | Richard | Honeybourne Line cycle path has apparently been extended as far as Lansdown Road: http://www.thebicyclehubblog.co.uk/2015/05/honeybourne-line-extended.html http://www.southwestbusiness.co.uk/news/17032015090624-station-cycle-route-in-cheltenham-gets--1m-southern-extension/ |
|||
370273 | Richard | Lots of roads here tagged highway=service when they're unpaved and would be much better as highway=track (or, for a few wider ones, highway=unclassified, surface=unpaved). |
|||
555948 | Richard | New cycleway around here, including rerouted NCN 68 |
« Previous | Page 3 | Next »