OpenStreetMap

CycleStreets's notes

Notes submitted or commented on by CycleStreets

« Previous | Page 1 | Next »

Id Creator Description Created at Last changed
closed 316067 CycleStreets

New footpath needs review. Added in path but not clear whether this is legally cycleable or not, and surface and width would be useful to add.

about 2 years ago about 2 months ago
open 842818 CycleStreets

Is this path legal for cycling or not? What is the approx width, and is it lit?

about 2 months ago about 2 months ago
open 262534 CycleStreets

Area needs survey now that grass and pathways are open.

over 2 years ago 3 months ago
closed 234669 Richard

Cycle Superhighway (CS2x) is currently mapped with on-road tracks (cycleway=track) which is a suboptimal solution. Should be replaced with a separate highway=cycleway to recognise segregated nature of route.

over 2 years ago 3 months ago
open 795700 CycleStreets

This path, and the related sections, are marked as a footway. Are bicycles permitted to use it?

Ce chemin, ainsi que les sections correspondantes, sont marqués comme un passage à pied. Les bicyclettes sont-elles autorisées à l'utiliser?

3 months ago 3 months ago
open 795699 CycleStreets

These steps are not connected to anything. Do they provide a route down to the path by the river?

Ces étapes ne sont pas connectées à quoi que ce soit. Fournissent-ils un itinéraire vers le bas pour le chemin par la rivière?

3 months ago 3 months ago
open 795698 CycleStreets

This long path is marked as a 'Service road'. Is that correct?

Il s'agit d'une «route de service». Est-ce correct?

3 months ago 3 months ago
open 780521 CycleStreets

This section has some contradictory tagging - it says bicycle=yes but access=private.

As a result, routes are showing up like this:
https://www.cyclestreets.net/journey/55840479/

4 months ago 4 months ago
closed 641217 CycleStreets

Need to check cycle tracks at these two junctions due to the construction work.

7 months ago 4 months ago
closed 715082 CycleStreets

This is marked as access=destination, meaning it is not possible as a through route for bicycles from the main road to the cycleway. Is that correct?

Dies wird als access=destination markiert, was bedeutet es für Fahrräder von der Hauptstraße zum Fahrradweg nicht möglich, da eine durchgehende Strecke ist. Ist das richtig?

5 months ago 5 months ago

« Previous | Page 1 | Next »