https://openstreetmap.org/copyright | https://openstreetmap.org |
Copyright OpenStreetMap and contributors, under an open license |
https://openstreetmap.org/copyright | https://openstreetmap.org |
Copyright OpenStreetMap and contributors, under an open license |
Most renders, including Mapnik, show this correctly. The only one I've found that shows the footpath above the road is OpenCycleMap, so isn't this just a rendering issue?
Thanks Tom. I made some changes last week that seem to have sorted it. I should have removed/resolved the note, and will now do so.
Hi spiregrain!
Sorry to reactive this note, just a minor point, but wouldn't
bridge=yes
bridge:structure=floating
be more appropriate here?
You mean for the towpath under gillender street and the A12? It is a floating structure with a path along it. Whether it counts as a bridge or not is a matter of opinion - it doesn't go *across* the water, it goes along the side of the water. Happy with your judgement - it's bridgelike in most respects.
Yeah, it's a funny one. The only alternative I can think of;
man_made=pier, floating=yes
Doesn't quite fit either.
Hi. FWIW I definitely wouldn't call it a bridge, it really isn't a bridge. I don't know of any conventional tagging to express what it is. If I was adding this from scratch I think I would do highway=footway, bicycle=yes, surface=wood, floating=yes. It's really a normal footway but we just want to express that it's a floating structure, that's the only thing that makes it different.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:floating
Yep, I'd go along with that mcld.