https://openstreetmap.org/copyright | https://openstreetmap.org |
Copyright OpenStreetMap and contributors, under an open license |
https://openstreetmap.org/copyright | https://openstreetmap.org |
Copyright OpenStreetMap and contributors, under an open license |
Just a regular BAG import of all the adressnodes in a new appartment building.
See this:
https://www.google.nl/maps/@52.7785771,6.8965895,3a,75y,179h,90t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1s5PeKATLQUJuy6YlX3ib5Mg!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo0.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3D5PeKATLQUJuy6YlX3ib5Mg%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dsearch.TACTILE.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D392%26h%3D106%26yaw%3D179.56641%26pitch%3D0!7i13312!8i6656?hl=nl
Looks like a multi story building, so why not tagg them with level=* to express in which level of the building the notes are...
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/crI 60 nodes in that small area btw...
That's the way almost all addressnodes have been imported the Netherlands.
Check this one:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/51.66491/5.29637
The nodes have probably been put in line by the person who did the import (or by somebode else).
Part of the problem is that all that house numbers are in reality very close together near the entrance of the building. There is some sort of agreement that the node for the address should be put as close to its real-world position. That is impossible with these kind of buildings, hence the distribution over the area.
Please discuss this on the osm forum, note closed