https://openstreetmap.org/copyright | https://openstreetmap.org |
Copyright OpenStreetMap and contributors, under an open license |
https://openstreetmap.org/copyright | https://openstreetmap.org |
Copyright OpenStreetMap and contributors, under an open license |
sembra abbastanza largo per consentire il passaggio di un veicolo, al limite io lo convertirei in track, percorso pedonale non mi sembra il tag piĆ¹ adatto. Non conoscendo la zona potrei benissimo sbagliarmi.
Sorry, I don't speak Italian too well. Yes the path is quite wide, but at the intersection to the south there is actually a sign saying: "Percorso a piedi"
hi, thanks for you reply.
How wide is it? Do cars can use this road? if this road is wide enough to let a car/tractor through, I'd tag it as highway=unclassified + foot=yes + surface=asphalt (is it asphalt right?) + lanes=1 (according to the satellite imagery it looks to me wide enough for a car but not enough for two cars, correct?)
Let me know what you think.
Thanks for your help
Cheers
Based on my memory of the place, it has the width of a small passenger car and asphalt=yes. But more importantly, does "Percorso a piedi" not mean vehicle=no? Cheers Leuty
Hi, "Percorso a piedi" means that the road is likely to be part of a pedestrian itinerary but if you didn't see any traffic sign saying "No cars allowed" I think that cars are allowed and they share this road section with pedestrians.
I'm not sure if foot=designated would be more appropriate.
cheers