OpenStreetMap allows people to add notes to the map, people can comment and mark a problem as resolved. This is an easy way for mappers to talk to each other (“Is this mapped right?” “Yes I was there the other month, the aerial imgaery is old” “OK So”), and is an easy way for non-OSM people to provide simple feedback without needing to log in, and (importantly) not break the map if they don’t know what they are doing. Experienced mappers can use them to highlight areas or issues they think should be addressed.
There are now more than 1,000,000 notes in OSM. There was some discussion on the OSM main mailing list about this. Some people don’t like how easy it is for some apps (Maps.me) to add notes, and complain about the amount of useless notes. Yes, a high signal to noise ratio can make things hard. However OSM is open and a wiki map. There shouldn’t be barriers and gatekeepers. If you want only “approved” people to be able to add data to your map, go play with Google Map Maker.
The concern about signal to noise ratios is valid. There are a lot of notes now. About 250,000 open notes. (check on pascal neis’ notes page).
So I’m going to make an effort to look at notes and try to fix up problems. Some cannot be solved from the armchair, but there are lots of new users leaving notes that can be closed, or which describe things which have since been mapped. And some are things you could map. I’m going to work my way through some of the notes in Ireland.
If we all take a few minutes each day to look at notes that people are submitting, we’ll keep the map updated and fixed up.
Discussion
Comment from Chetan_Gowda on 27 May 2017 at 14:24
@rorym This is a nice post! Thank you. It’s true that many new users without having knowledge of OpenStreetMap Notes, added lot of them. We can close them all. On the other hand, many of them need ground survey and local knowledge. Its the same case in India too. Some of the active users are doing great job of taking care of these notes.
Comment from Hendric Stattmann on 28 May 2017 at 12:39
@rorym: I appreciate your comment. I am taking care of the notes in my home region or during my travel. What I would like to see is an integrated service unifying the separate resources of OSM notes, Keepright and other QA tools, so we can have it all in one place and fix them more easily.
Comment from PlaneMad on 29 May 2017 at 11:53
It would be great to have a tool that allows one to review and fix notes on the move, this can be a very fun outdoor activity and wish one could view notes in maps.me. Are there any mobile apps that lets one work on notes?
Comment from michalfabik on 29 May 2017 at 14:40
I think there should be a requirement to at least fill in some information. There’s loads of Maps.me notes that don’t contain any useful information at all, besides the default Maps.me text. I’m thinking of some short form with combo boxes/multiple choice questions that the submitter would have to fill in to be allowed to submit the note:
What’s wrong with the map?
* A feature is missing from the map.
* A feature is mapped but it’s attributes are inaccurate/outdated.
* A feature is mapped but its position is inaccurate.
* A feature is mapped but its shape is inaccurate.
* A feature is mapped but it’s no longer here IRL.
How did you find out?
* I visited the place in person.
* Somebody told me.
* The map looks wrong.
How do you suggest that we fix the issue?
[freeform text here]
(Obviously, this is just to illustrate the general idea, so don’t quote me on that.)
I believe this wouldn’t introduce any barriers to speak of (much less gatekeepers) and it might help to curb obvious nonsense a little (the kind of notes in the middle of a random square in Moscow that just say “hotel in moscow” in Arabic, or similar). OTOH, I wouldn’t be surprised if I’m just being naive and it wouldn’t make any difference at all. *shrug*
Comment from amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 on 30 May 2017 at 07:31
Maps.me has been updated to include more data example.
I would also add options like “I checked on Google Maps”, and then if the user selects that, the note silently gets deleted. 🙂
Comment from Urbán Máté on 30 May 2017 at 10:01
Hi everyone,
Also for Hungary, there are many useless notes. Although we have at least as many useful ones. I’m going to go and check on them. Is there a list view of notes somewhere that is easy to overview?
I will use formula from now on: What’s wrong with the map? How did you find out? How do you suggest that we fix the issue?
Comment from Teester on 31 May 2017 at 00:47
@Urbán Máté: For viewing notes, one option is https://teester.github.io/osm-notes-viewer, though it’s limited to displaying the 100 most recently changed open notes in the selected area for performance reasons. Note that larger areas take longer to load.
There’s also https://teester.github.io/osm-changeset-viewer which does a similar job on recent changesets.
Comment from philippec on 31 May 2017 at 09:31
That teester could motivate me to start solving notes again. I was dissapointed in the lack of active support of mappers in combatting a silly notes bombardment in my region by a foreigner.
In teeser, when I click on “commented”, nothing happens. An easy to solve bug, I suppose.
Comment from Urbán Máté on 31 May 2017 at 10:35
@Teester: Thanks for the links! These are useful little tools.
Comment from philippec on 1 June 2017 at 08:33
“An easy to solve bug, I suppose.”
No, it is a feature.