OpenStreetMap

alexkemp's Diary Comments

Diary Comments added by alexkemp

Post When Comment
Realising I don't need to date my entries over 1 year ago

Hi berrybine

Two things:

  1. Different countries order their dates differently; therefore “01/07/2020” could be interpreted as “1 July 2020” or “7 January 2020”. It is perhaps better to get into the habit of using the Japanese order of “2020-07-01” (yyyy-mm-dd), which is less open to misinterpretation & also provides a natural ordering.
  2. With these diaries folks expect it to be a Diary entry that is OSM-related. Do that until folks get used to you, and then occasionally you can go off-topic & still keep your readers. Just never, ever spam.
Survey points etc over 1 year ago

Overlords? Long past? Where on earth do you live, kucai?

You are not alone in having to fight bureaucracy. Ordnance Survey were originally a branch of the military. Now a private company, they have to be arm-wrestled for every scrap of information (and they are the sole possessors of).

To date they (and others) have been instructed by the government to provide free access to all UK-wide:

  • Postcode centroids
  • Borderline information
    (GPS for Coastline, Country & County lines)
  • Road information
    (GPS & names)

They still withhold address information.

Survey points etc over 1 year ago

Hi kucai

This is something that I’ve struggled with also, and particularly now that we have all been in Covid-19 lockdown, and I do not even have a metres-bad GPS track to rely on. The solution that I have been relying on in the UK follows this decision matrix:

  1. The UK roads have all been imported from an accurate Ordnance Survey DB (or at least we hope that it is accurate - my own cross-reference investigations from BorderLine imports say ‘yes’, as in the common situations where a border follows a road, river or other feature it has normally matched perfectly)
  2. The English are obsessed with roundabouts, both small & large
  3. When the Borders (mentioned above) have passed through such roundabouts it has frequently been straight through the middle
  4. The roundabouts provide an excellent target when looking through imagery, much like firing an arrow (I live in Nottingham)

The upshot (pun intended) of the above is that I correct the Imagery used to the nearest roundabout that I can find. It seems to work well so far.

Newington over 1 year ago

These could be quickly adjusted using maps

That statement needs to be heavily modified: almost all modern maps can NOT be used to update the OSM map. That is due to the copyrights deployed within modern maps.

This is the relevant statement from the OSM Copyright Statement:

OSM contributors are reminded never to add data from any copyrighted sources (e.g. Google Maps or printed maps) without explicit permission from the copyright holders.

Hiking trails in OpenStreetMap over 1 year ago

somewhat based on UK English rather than real English words

“real”???

Not going to even attempt to make further comment, other than to point out the self-parody involved in the language construction. And no, England does not own English, any more than any other locality that makes use of English owns it.

field names and how to tag them (Ireland) over 1 year ago

The en:Wikipedia page on Meadow is pretty damn good.

There is zero connection to streams/rivers, though they would need decent water supply & drainage to function well as a meadow (the first not usually a problem in Ireland nor England, of course). In connection with Victorian times they would often be odd fields close to a city that remained as common-land after enclosure, and thus functioned as places to stroll & take exercise on a Sunday.

They had a vital function as sources of Hay to feed the animals in Winter. In modern times they are often deliberate sources of greensward sown with meadow flowers as the premium sod for the back-garden.

More field names over 1 year ago

Excellent stuff.

As far as I’m concerned, what you are doing is exactly what OSM is designed for. There are possibly thousands of years of history in those farmer’s names. And to think that it has come down through word-of-mouth only. This is getting like the bard’s folk-tales.

SA School Mapping Started over 1 year ago

So this is correct, then?

name:cy=Ysgol Uwchradd Aberteifi
name:en=Cardigan Secondary School

Any idea as to the Operator? Would it be Welsh Assembly or local Council or something else?

(literal) Crop Circles in Northern Ireland over 1 year ago

@spiregrain:

I suspect BT will take longer

Just 9 schools in the East Riding of Yorkshire have an EduBase ID mapped, and (so far) almost none have contacts nor addresses fully mapped. So, I suspect that HU may take longer than BT. If I get to the end & you are still going, then I’ll start at the end & map towards you.

This is definitely a marathon rather than a sprint. It’s amazing that so much much has been mapped, and yet as soon as you dip your toe in it is obvious that so much remains to be done.

I’m pleased that I switched. I was enjoying exploring the NI countryside, even if only vicariously, but EY is the place I was born, brought up in & made a good living from as a young man. It’s 40+ years since I travelled it and, even if on occasions bitter sweet, a pleasure to revisit.

(literal) Crop Circles in Northern Ireland over 1 year ago

@spiregrain:
I see little point in 2 of us using the same site (mathmos.net) to do the same work - far too much chance of interfering with each other. So, I’ve wrapped up the table that I was working on in the BT postcode section, and will switch to HU instead (my home town was Hull, and I spent my youth working in the East Yorkshire region).

(literal) Crop Circles in Northern Ireland over 1 year ago

Hi spiregrain

The charts and tables here https://osm.mathmos.net/schools/progress/BT/

I’m making use of the same site, and came across one of the schools that you had mapped (St Oliver Plunkett Primary School at BT11).

For NI I’m finding these three to be useful additions to mathmos.net:

The first two are Northern Ireland-specific school search sites, whilst the last one occasionally has web-address URLs that the first one does not. However, I’m often left with a generic web-search for the URL (I find Google maps to be best for that).

I’m making a point of entering full Contact & Address details (using the JOSM presets) as that is precisely what will be searched for (and why, imo, OSM maps can be useful).

(literal) Crop Circles in Northern Ireland over 1 year ago

Thank you Jude & Alan for scratching my intellectual itch. I never thought of Northern Ireland as an equestrian centre, but I guess that that is just my normal ignorance. I’ll go back & fix the mapping to try & reflect that.

Advanced JOSM Work on Schools over 1 year ago

@Polyglot:
The wiki on Site Relations says ‘use multi for schools’ (see one of the other recent diaries - I forget which one - for proper quote & url). That seems conclusive to me.

Site seems to have all the disadvantages & none of the advantages of Multi. So, what about them?

Haileybury and Imperial Service College, Hertfordshire over 1 year ago

will_p:
Here is the link to where I found the info in my previous post:

The main use case of this statement is to search for objects inside an area, which is again inside another area (“area in area query”)

An Overpass API internal area creation job does not ordinarily create links to areas-in-areas. Therefore, your previous link would not have worked for a site relation any more than it worked for my multipolygon relation. Therefore, folks can create interactive maps to their heart’s content with my so-called non-standard use of a multipolygon. They simply need to learn how to use the Overpass API correctly.

Haileybury and Imperial Service College, Hertfordshire over 1 year ago

will_p:
It turned out that your Overpass Query was the problem. Here is a query that shows any of the way tags and, indeed, any of the node tags, directly when clicked on in the map; so much for non-standard:

rel(11028673);    
(._;>;);    
out;              // output relation
map_to_area;      // map OSM relation to Overpass API area by adding 3600000000 to its id    
(._;>;);    
out;              // output area 3611028673

Paste it into the Overpass window at https://overpass-turbo.eu/

Haileybury and Imperial Service College, Hertfordshire over 1 year ago

will_p:
The school is now complete as best as I can manage (only Avenue - the entrance avenue - wants to be included, but a line within a multipolygon throws an error so I left it out).

Checking the Overpass-query again, none of the component tags show, either outer nor inner. That can be confirmed by clicking on the Tennis Courts (marked as outer since they are outside the formal Cadastre for Haileybury); only the Relation tags show if one of the Members is clicked. I do not know whether that is normal behaviour for every Relation or not.

Haileybury and Imperial Service College, Hertfordshire over 1 year ago

will_p:

Alternatively let’s say someone creates an interactive map where people can click on features to show more information. In this case, clicking on the buildings (or other features tagged with the ‘inner’ role) won’t work if the multipolygon is correctly rendered. Here’s an Overpass query that shows this: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/ThB. The tags are not displayed if you click, for example, on the Arboretum or most of the buildings.

That’s a useful tool.

I’m unsure whether your comment on lack-of-tags is due to the reason you give, as the Terrace Parking areas are tagged as ‘outer’ but still do not show any tags.

Here is Fernwood school: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11026813 (a very simple relation holding 2 sites for the same school). Does a similar overpass query for that show the same symptoms? Only showing tags for the relation itself? Or is that because of the query used rather than the mapping method used?

Can you show me a situation where a Site relation allows components to be clicked on & show their tags? That would be a compelling demonstration.

Please realise Will that I am NOT trying to avoid what you are saying - quite the reverse. It is simply not enough to demonstrate that the method used does NOT work. It also needs for a different method to be shown that DOES work, else I will spend my time doing a headless chicken demonstration.

Haileybury and Imperial Service College, Hertfordshire over 1 year ago

highflyer74:
> I would not use name=(unnamed) but rather not tag it at all.

Looked again at this after a sleep. Not the slightest doubt that you are right (very jarring). I’ve removed all such name-tags. Will upload together with other changes.

Haileybury and Imperial Service College, Hertfordshire over 1 year ago

Howdy kucai

My answer is “yes”, but I suspect you may wish for more details.

In ordinary circumstances there are many people locked-down within restricted circumstances. A sequence of photographs along a route allows such people to more fully experience the nature of the place. I’ve had a small number of places where I’ve made such a sequence.

The more-usual driving sequences are intended for automatic derivation of traffic signs, etc.. I’m not involved in that.

Most of the 7k-odd photos that I’ve taken are PoI photos, intended to attach to PoI so that OSM map users can get a visual appreciation of a specific location. I’m looking for depth as well as breadth. They are also intended to lodge info for later use during mapping at the computer.

My main reason is so that I do not get lost whilst re-creating my survey on the computer. That is why I photo so many street-signs.

Haileybury and Imperial Service College, Hertfordshire over 1 year ago

Hi highflyer74

The use of a “Parking” prefix (etc.) is deliberate. It is used so that humans can look down the list in the Relation & survey all the different Parking places (etc.) in one block (there are almost 100 members now).

The reason for the use of “(unnamed)” is to provoke someone to complete the mapping (possibly me if I can wangle an invite to photo the buildings). I’ll see how it sits with me after everything else has been entered.