ok grazie, provvedo a rimuovere il tratto doppio quindi, visto che non risulta visibile ne sulla heatmap di strava, ne sulle immagini aeree.
grazie!

ho provveduto io, controlla pure sia corretto

Ciao, occhio che questa sterrata da te aggiunta non risulta connessa al resto della rete stradale/sentieristica, risultando quindi una specie di "isola".
Va connessa

ciao, in riferimento a questo ( way/366837225/history ) tratto di sentiero da te modificato; era prima etichettato come sentiero sterrato, adatto a cavalli, mtb e pedoni. É giusto averlo conferito in ciclabile asfaltata con nome "Sentiero Valtellina"?
Il nome è a prescindere superfluo perché nel caso andrebbe dato alla relazione del Sentiero Valtellina, non a tutti i tratti che lo compongono. Il mio dubbio però riguarda la vera esistenza di questa "variante" tra l'Adda e l'altro tratto parallelo di sentiero Valtellina.
Confermi che questo tratto esista, sia asfaltato e faccia davvero parte del sentiero Valtellina?
grazie

Thanks!

Please make sure you also add a access tag with the proper value selected.
This one looks like a private and gated service road, would be good to have it tagged as so then.
Thanks

Hi Tania, if you add a building tag to a area (just like you did here way/699357836 and here way/699357837) it means that the whole area is a building, which is definitely not correct here. The two areas you have been drawing are not buildings, they do contain buildings, but also a parking lot, few service roads, a swimming pool,...
Also, the same error (on a smaller scale) was already been done by the mapper adding this one way/332545657 and the other hotel just north-east.
Now, having two oversized buildings one within the other is twice wrong.
Could you please remove those two areas you added and improve the already mapped hotel building shape?
thanks

grazie!

Ciao, quando salvi una modifica per favore aggiungi un breve commento; "aggiunti nomi vie" qua poteva andare bene.
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Grazie

Hi there, "Mailand: Cornaredo" doesn't really tell much about your edit.
Could you please use proper changeset comments?
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Thanks

Seems like road section was tagged as access=private by another amazon guy few days ago, as per changeset way/685540504/history
If this one's private, the other two roads crossing it should be tagged as private as well.
Generally speaking, I think amazon guys do a nice job adding service roads, but they almost every time ignore access restrictions, which should be added to those service roads instead, as 99% of the times, those roads are private, and can deceive navigators and other map users.
Thanks!

Hi, may bad, note I was referring to is this one
note/1824555
Thanks!

Ciao, grazie per la modifica!
Riguardo l'Atelier Vania, riesci per favore, come deciso dalla community, a spostare l'indirizzo su un nodo singolo, in corrispondenza della posizione della targhetta del civico?
Come questo per fare un esempio node/5204948024
Inoltre, se l'Atelier non occupa tutto l'edificio, converrebbe aggiungere il negozio come un singolo nodo, non dare a tutto l'edificio quel nome.
Grazie, ciao!

Hi there, do all those water area really exist?
I suspect this is a pokemon go related edit, please note, this is not allowed.
Make sure you stick to those basic rules osm.wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

Hi there, welcome to OSM!
I've noticed you've been adding a lot of objects to our map in the last couple of days.
Please slow down a bit and make sure you do things the right way.
You've been adding a lot of names, but you have to understand that not every object deserves a name. You would name "White house" the White House, but you wouldn't name "House" every house of the map, "tree" every tree, "Church" every curch and so on.
Here you added a church named Baptist, but I'm pretty sure it's name is not "Baptist".
Tags are there for a reason, if you want to say that a building is a church you have to use the right tag (building=church), if you want to say that a church is run by Baptists, you should use denomination=Baptist tag and so on.
Same works for this one way/700270064 , if you want to say it's a dog park you should tag is as a leisure=dog_park. Now that one looks like a park, named "Dog Park".
Look at this map osm.org/#map=16/37.5615/-121.9947&layers=N and please adjust what's been pointed out by those red notes. Please make sure you also add a comment to those notes.
Should you need any tips, please reply here!
Thanks!

Concordo, la classificazione avviene in base a precise caratteristiche, non è spannometrica e personale.
osm.wiki/IT:Key:highway#Highway_.28strade_e_vie.29
Ho notato una tua modifica a Tirano, SO, con la stessa trasformazione secondary>residential

Grazie!

grazie!

Hi there Melannial, welcome to OSM and thanks for your map edit!
I've just stumbled upon this note note/1827342 and would like to give you a quick tip about.
I've noticed you added the trail as multiple standalone sections:
note/1827342
way/700237054
way/700237053
and some more.

In order to make things easier, you should have been drawing just one section. Drawing multiple sections is a method only used when those sections need to be tagged with different values, which happens (as an example) when a section is paved, the next one is unpaved or so.
If you like, please try merge all those short ways, otherwise I could help doing that.
Thanks

ottimo, grazie!